English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm with MLK...I'm glad my party does not judge by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. My party assumes anyone who puts in the effort and planning will make a great and free life. A different party keeps telling minorities that the deck is stacked against them, and they can't make it without THEIR help. I'm not naming names...you answer.

2007-12-12 13:41:28 · 5 answers · asked by Yahoo Answer Angel 6 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

amber...a very nice!!!

2007-12-12 14:03:56 · update #1

5 answers

Nakia, what a racial comment. Democrats pander to minorities. That is a proven fact, however, no dems have been able to prove to me that Republicans pander to big business. I always here how reps are in bed with big oil, but when I ask no lefty can give me an example...other than Bush being part of the Oil industry in the past. When is having an affiliation proof of wrong doing. I see not laws or legislation which would prove to me that reps are doing anything to help out oil companies. However, on the other side of the coin, I do see Democrats in bed with Big Healthcare. I see legislation all the time for them wanting to basically drum up free government money for the Healthcare corporations. Free health insurance for poor children is the same as saying we will gaurantee the health insurance companies governmetn business. So again, most lefties arguements have little if any factual basis. All accusations. And to answer the posters questions, the Democrats buy votes all the time. The minorities in this county know little to nothing about politics. All they know is the Dems will at least cater to their "so called" issues, however, they don't actually do anything for them. So on the one hand I don't know if I should feel sorry for the minorities for not knowing they are really not being represented or laugh because their one sidedness actually works against.

2007-12-12 13:55:30 · answer #1 · answered by amber s 4 · 1 1

initially I ought to allow you to be attentive to are incorrect because of the fact republicans help our united states of america unlike democrats. Republicans make much less taxes giving those with jobs the convenience to discover the money for issues. yet with a democrat president most of the time taxes would be raised and the money will acquire to the undesirable. This does sound good besides the undeniable fact that it isnt. Democrats basicaly opt to take all the money from the wealthy and middle type that artwork extremley not uncomplicated and supply it to the persons that are undesirable and dont artwork or artwork not uncomplicated in any respect. fantastically conventional well being care. that's how existence ought to flow: in case you like well being care artwork not uncomplicated for it. If not you cant get it. Democrats think of oppositly. they opt to do away with from the not uncomplicated working (wealthy and middle type) and supply to persons that dont do something and sit down around waiting not working (undesirable). go republicans Troll Hunter is suited

2016-11-03 02:18:11 · answer #2 · answered by liberis 3 · 0 0

Neither party, its not a function of the Party to provide assistance. The government as a whole does that and its a bipartian decision.

2007-12-12 13:48:50 · answer #3 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 0 1

dems cater to minorities, republicans cater to corporations.


..."I'm glad my party does not judge by the color of their skin"...

LMMFAO

Some goober from your party shot mlk.

2007-12-12 13:45:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

i hate it, im a dem. , but the thing bout the moron guy is soo annoying one of my best friends is moron, doesnt mean she believes in monogamy or any of that otha crap they hate him for

2007-12-12 13:45:07 · answer #5 · answered by Fred W 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers