Since we know they won't stand up to the terrorists (besides launching a few missiles at training camps)...
2007-12-12 13:35:38 · 21 answers · asked by WJ 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not at all. Instead they will probably attack the correct culprits and not lose focus due to the possibility of mega-war profits.
2007-12-12 13:41:33 · answer #1 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Of course and if we can get Jackie Chans endorsement, maybe China will be cool. Who can we get from Cuba, Columbia, Costa Rica, california, Montana, Missouri, Arkansas, Missisisppi, kentucky, Florida, Germany, Denmark, Russia, Utah-Rommney, Texas, Washington, Oregon, New York, Mass, Japan, Korea, Maylasia, Australia-Mick Dundee, New Zealand,etc:
2016-05-23 07:42:37 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, not like G.W. Bush, who launched a war against Iraq, a country everyone knew had nothing to do with 9/11, while allowing our efforts in Afghanistan to die on the vine.
Republicans are weak on defense because they think every problem can be solved by throwing tanks at it. They're not realists, and they're not smart enough to actually solve problems. That's what happens when you're blinded by greed.
2007-12-12 13:43:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well, Khalid bin Bargash surrendered to the British at Zanzibar in thirty-eight minutes, so I'd guess Mrs. Clinton would abdicate in twenty-four minutes and Obama in sixteen.
2007-12-12 13:43:32 · answer #4 · answered by CanadianFundamentalist 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not as fast as bush caved in to terrorists on 9/11.
2007-12-12 13:39:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
It will not happen. They will have to have one investigation after another to try to find out what happened. When they finally come up with an solution as to what to do about it, they will flip flop for and against that course of action. That could take about eight years to complete. By that time a Republican will come to power and blow the **** out of some country we thought had something to do with it and we will get back to where we are today.
2007-12-12 13:43:23 · answer #6 · answered by Big J 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The Chicken Hawks Bush and Cheney are your idea of courageous?? Doesn't take much to fool you.
Our chicken hawks in chief would be in a bunker before you could take a breath if they were asked to stand up to danger personally.
They are good at asking worthwhile young people to die in a Wag The Dog War to help them cover their failure to find Osama though.
2007-12-12 13:40:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Since neither will be President its an irrevelent question. You will have a white, male republican in the White House. America is not ready for either a woman or black President.
2007-12-12 13:52:41 · answer #8 · answered by Robert S 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Good joke boostoem .....
We saw how quickly Hillary acted to solve the issue at her campaign headquarters in NH.
2007-12-12 13:39:36 · answer #9 · answered by TexasTrev38 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They may bomb another aspirin factory in the Sudan. At least Hillary, that is. Not so sure about Barack.
But it won't be in the Darfur region, the Clintons already proved they don't care about that.
Vote for Rudy!
2007-12-12 13:38:15 · answer #10 · answered by Rick K 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋