none of the above. both tax and spend socialist liberals.
2007-12-12 11:37:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Obama. He is the only candidate for real and serious change. His "lack of experience" will give him a fresh perspective that his opponent lacks. If you want a president who can lead, vote Obama. If you want more of the same, vote Clinton.
2007-12-12 23:51:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Neither! All the talk about the "like-ability" factor in regards to Hillary hits home for me. Personally, I don't like her. I like Obama but he has been stuttering a lot lately. I think he's exhausted and the campaign stress factor is setting in. It's brutal, and it's only going to get worse. When I hear him talk, it makes me almost start stuttering.
I have supported John Edwards since 2004. He is the solution and the true leader in the race. I just finished reading "Four Trials." John is a fighter for those that need defended. We need somebody to start looking out for Americans for a change. Remember *37 million Americans in poverty* and *47 million Americans without health care*. Americans need help desperately.
2007-12-12 19:46:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Honey_B 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hillary Clinton. It is easier said than being done. Obama is all talk...anyone can say what they want to win the votes. Obama wants to bring the country together??well..how the heck is he gonna do that as a rookie senator from Illinois. WE should believe everything he says because he has absoulutely no record of anything to look back on??
2007-12-12 19:13:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by MrEntrepreneur 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Clinton will not immediately withdraw from Iraq, nor take attacking Iran off the table. So, out of those two, I'd have to vote Obama.
2007-12-12 19:06:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Matt 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
None of the above.
My pick is Ron Paul.
-he voted against the Iraq war
-he has never voted to raise taxes
-he voted against the Patriot Act
-he opposes amnesty for illegals
-he opposes entering war with Iran
-he voted against Bush's amendment banning gay marriages
-he is for reducing the national debt by cutting government spending instead of placing the burden on taxpayers
-he is for fair trade
-he is for limited government
-he is for handling global situations with diplomacy
-his voting record is consistent
-he isn't backed by corporations, lobbyists and special interest groups
Source(s):
www.ronpaul2008.com
2007-12-12 20:09:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Obama
He does not want a divided America, he wants to bring us all together to create a greater America. He wants to end corporations influence in Washington and make sure that the peoples interests are being looked after. He wants to bring credibility back to the white house and to show the world once more that we are not all arrogant neo-cons. Obama wants to make sure that science and math are being taught to every student.
2007-12-12 19:08:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by asylum922 3
·
3⤊
3⤋
No. Nor would I vote for Giuliani. Romney, maybe.
2007-12-12 19:06:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Leah 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
None of the above. I'd picked Edwards or Giuliani.
2007-12-12 19:06:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Neither. Profound ideological differences with both of them.
2007-12-12 19:08:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Trollbuster 6
·
1⤊
1⤋