2007-12-12 10:28:51 · 25 answers · asked by Vick (Philadelphia Phreedom) 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Pretty hard to play the race card when the victim's a dog as opposed to two white people, so probably not.
2007-12-12 10:31:54 · answer #1 · answered by davster 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
tell him that basically to blame breeders ought to breed there dogs and he'd extra advantageous be keen to spend a minimum of three hundred-500 funds or each and each domestic dog. tell him breeders have ability extra advantageous expenditures throughout being pregnant, you have the time and price of whelping (the two you're taking day off from artwork or something is going incorrect and you should take her in to the vets). you should save the domestic dogs for a minimum of 8 weeks till now sending them to their properties; you should promote and discover good properties for the domestic dogs, you should make certain they have had their pictures till now going. you have gotten conceivable vet expenditures if the domestic dogs require extra advantageous interest. If the fairly some domestic dogs die, or you have a smaller than commonly used clutter, you won't get as lots funds from the sale of the domestic dogs as you had nevertheless. There are even ability issues later on with dissatified shoppers. What if the whelping is going incorrect and lifeless domestic dogs are born? What if the different dogs dies? those are all very genuine risks that he's project. what's the breed of your dogs? Is it aggresive? then dont breed it. Plus, there are thank you to many dogs without properties, in case you like extra dogs, undertake.
2016-11-03 01:45:47 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes he would be free, which brings me to another question: If someone cut the head off of a cat they would be questioned, but it is perfectly okay to trap and kill a mouse or to swat at a mosquito. Why? Who decides what animal's lives are of most value. They do after all have feel pain and emotion just as we do. So what gives us the right to kill them relentlessly?
2007-12-12 10:41:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Um as far as I know, he never did any jail time for severing the heads off of two people. What makes you think he'd do jail time for killing defenseless animals?
2007-12-12 10:32:34 · answer #4 · answered by ≤ Flattery Operated © 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No he would find another way to get himself in trouble
By the way smarty. He was never convicted of killing anyone. As far as I know he is a free man today....(out on bail free man)
2007-12-12 10:31:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
o.j simpson and micheal vick going take their prison to the jail bowl lol
2007-12-12 10:34:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
a scentence for animal cruelty wouldnt be like 18 years,
so yes. but he should still be jailed for that armed robery thing and the whole killing his wife thing.
2007-12-12 10:35:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Good Point
2007-12-12 10:30:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
He would be charged with sever animal cruelty and that would be bad
2007-12-12 10:35:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I understand your question, I have thought the same thing
2007-12-12 10:32:48 · answer #10 · answered by Jo 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋