How are the Republicans going to cut spending when we are spending billions on a war they all support?

Question

The news reports that Republican presidential rivals called for deep cuts in federal spending Wednesday in a debate.

Answer 1

You're right, they all support it... BESIDES Ron Paul.. hes the only one that has any kind of logical way to cut spending, bring our troops home, stop medling in other nations problems, and cut back on the size of our government...

Answer 2

Simple. Ron Paul is the only Republican anti-war candidate. He is also the only candidate from either party that will bring the troops home ASAP - even the democrats have 4-6 year (or more) plans on bringing home the troops, while Ron Paul is the only man who will call about an immediate withdrawl of our troops.

FYI, Ron Paul is also the only candidate who voted AGAINST the war even back when it was "popular".

Answer 3

i might factor out that as quickly as Congress authorized the conflict in Iraq, it grew to become into only approximately unanimous on the two aspects of the aisle. in addition to, why whine approximately 12 billion a month whilst the liberal controlled Congress spent and borrowed us right into a 14 TRILLION dollar debt mutually as elevating the debt decrease two times and borrowing almost 50 cents for ever dollar spent? I observed yet another answer falsely declare that "Obama's funds cuts 4 triilion" from the national debt. it somewhat is a load of you already know what. It demands an develop in spending, a modest one whilst in comparison with the out of control spending and sparkling verify the lib controlled Congress gave him, yet an develop in spite of the undeniable fact that. At a time whilst human beings are out of artwork, no longer looking artwork, have run out of reward and decrease value rates, and have no destiny promise of ever looking a properly paying job with advantages and in a protracted season of minimum econoomic develop, why rehash the same, drained, previous, argument? i might factor out that repub and con resistance to the expenses libs tout as "help to first responders" maximum commonly have a lot of beef coated and that the repub controlled domicile has banned earmarks. If our elected reps choose their expenses so undesirable, they must have the common-sense and decency to place a sparkling bill b4 their friends fairly of a beef encumbered bill they understand will fail and attempt to apply it to attain political factors off the opposing party. in spite of the undeniable fact that, i comprehend it somewhat is only too lots to ask of a bitterly partisan Congress and individuals such by using fact the asker. lol

Answer 4

I agree - exception being ron paul - while many were pandering to get the vote it didnt come across as sincere w/ the exception of paul who has been saying cut spending and voting that way for the last 10 years

Answer 5

Easy they will cut all domestic programs. A small sacrifice so Bush can prove he was right to invade Iraq.
Too bad they didn't think of this before. I guess the fact that they may be losing power turned the lights on.

Answer 6

Deep cuts on things they don't care about, while raising war spending. The cuts wouldn't need to be deep if we'd just get the hell out of there.

Answer 7

who knows??

they might actually cut the earmarks in the budget and axe the almost illegal under WTO rules farm subsidies. Export subsidies would be another good place to cut.

I'm sure there are plenty of other silly expenditures and these three leapt off the top of my head.

Answer 8

Ron Paul doesnt support the war and is the only canidate from either side that will bring the soldiers back home,

Answer 9

It is just before the elections? so yes they make some gestures and gas will come down just before the elections.
It is all done on credit, so the next president looks bad because he can't balance the budget. It is games.

Answer 10

They will cut all domestic programs that are beneficial to the health and prosperity of the U.S.A. citizens,plus all other necessary infrastructure needed issues of dire importance. It can't happen.