I have been an assistant to a mortgage broker for the past 2 1/2 yrs. Because I've worked for a very good mortgage broker (who actually finds the best rates to the borrower at the lowest price possible) I find it difficult to see good people like my boss become extinct due to bad brokers out there.
Indeed, I do believe that bank mortgage executives (& account executives) and underwriters are to blame for allowing the stated income/stated assets to have gone to far. Indeed, I feel that the banks should have questioned "obviously" inflated stated incomes by running a search from places like salary.com
NOW I feel that the mortgage banks will create a monopoly to charge WHATEVER they want to the borrower since they know that people are no longer going to brokers. At the same time too, I feel that banks should have asked why certain borrowers were applying for mortgages with predatory characteristics.
2007-12-12
09:08:19
·
6 answers
·
asked by
christiansareawesome
4
in
Business & Finance
➔ Renting & Real Estate
I believe that if broker lending laws were to require the wholesale banks to 1) require an audit to stated income programs, 2) require an interview with the borrower only when the mortgage program possessed predatory characteristics, 3) that brokers not be allowed to make more then 2-3 points per file, 4) that a bachelor's be required to become a mortgage broker be required. With all this in mind I see no reason why the mortgage broker should disappear.
2007-12-12
09:11:10 ·
update #1
Let's not forget that the way that Brokers make business is by getting wholesale rates from banks like Wells Fargo, Bank of America, WAMU, Citi, and so on. Bank of America HAS ALREADY shut down their wholesale program and is going strictly retail.
I assume that the other banks will go retail as well. What are your thoughts.
2007-12-13
09:35:01 ·
update #2