The final question is if this is one of those things you fight or let go.
And I have already done the "it's the principle that matters".
Ok... an excavating company did what's called a "cut" in the street. They were contracted by the water company who was ultimately given the right of way by the city to perform.
They usually are to put large metal plates over the cut. As well as a warning barricade.
But it was only done on one side of the street. I hit a washout in the cut directly with my front wheel.
Why, it wasn't covered, I don't know. It just wasn't done.
So I am out about $300 repair damage to the front end (wheel ball joint) of my car.
I realize that's minimal since it could of been so much more damage.
It's not like a nail was in the road and it's "no fault".
It could of been prevented were it not due to someones negligence of not following proper procedures.
The question before the one above is, who would be ultimately responsible for the damage?
2007-12-12
08:42:09
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Kari
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
Already been through the "food chain" from the water company, excavator was hostile to civility (go figure) and the Mayor said he talked to the city lawyer and was advised to go back to excavator. I asked who was the real Mayor if he had to "ask permission"
2007-12-12
10:48:32 ·
update #1