What constitutes a being or thing even as been worthy of moral consideration?

Answer 1

Volition.

Answer 2

I'm not at all sure of your question. Do you mean, on what occasions ought we to make moral decisions? If so, we ought to make moral decisions based on the Golden Rule. If we can see ourselves in the shoes of others, then there is an opportunity and an obligation to make a moral decision.

Answer 3

to not be impolite, yet I have no thought what various the different responders are speaking approximately. morality and ethics, at its center, seeks to respond to "how ought we act?" that question is an workout of reason and good judgment, it relatively is to declare that is a human corporation. consequently, people dictate what's and isn't morally proper. as far animals are worried, the espoused ethical concept is going to dictate what's worth of ethical attention. aristotelians, as an occasion, might like declare that the scientific care of animals is morally proper, not as a results of animals themselves (who're not ethical brokers or beings), yet as a results of influence their scientific care has on US (who're ethical). utilitarians are going to declare manage them in the form of vogue as to maximise utility. kantians are going to declare...properly, kantians and deontologists in many instances are tremendously rattling chop up on the topic (which certainly quantities to "do animals or timber or different non-human entities have "rights" that warrant us respecting them?")

Answer 4

A soul.