English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If this law was put into place where you live what would you do? and what do you think about it?
"No white can go into a black persons park, and no black s can go into a white persons park..."

and /or

whoever prints says or advertises equality between blacks and whites and agrees with intermarriage between races will be sent to prison for up to 6 days and a fine of 500$

(these were back in the 1900's (early))

2007-12-12 08:10:22 · 5 answers · asked by Mimi 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

5 answers

I would protest. I think it is unjust, undemorcratic and undermines America.

2007-12-12 08:14:28 · answer #1 · answered by margherita 4 · 0 1

i see the place you're going with this. the democrats have been the villains who defended slavery and jim crow jointly as the heroic republicans defeated it. enable me supply u some information. it became a majority on the two events that voted for the civil rights invoice. and there have been some dixiecrats and racist republicans that did all they'd to derail the attempt. the democratic occasion became created interior the south after the civil war to shelter slavery i will admit that. and that i now thatLincolnn became a republican...yet to tell this black guy that the republicans right this moment are extra a pal of the blacks and brown than the democrats (of right this moment) are. and don't get me incorrect i'm no democrat yet i've got no longer considered a single republican do something for the black community. and did no longer see many democrats the two. large attempt however.... i understand THAT the best is making an attempt to TAKE credit FOR CIVIL RIGHTS yet IM NO fool...

2016-12-10 21:05:46 · answer #2 · answered by ferranti 4 · 0 0

Neither law could stand if enacted today.

The first law would violate the 14th amendment, and the second one would violate the first amendment.

Oh, and by the way, there was nothing ridiculous about the courts ruling on whether a tomato was a fruit or a vegetable. They never ruled on any such thing. Even in the language of the actual ruling the court recognizes that a tomato is, in botanical terms, a fruit. What the ruling said was that did not bar Congress from taxing it as a vegetable if they chose to. There was another case right about the same time where someone tried to get a tax credit on bean sales by claiming that beans were seeds, not vegetables. The court ruled the same way on that one - botanically, beans are indeed seeds, but in everyday usage, people think of them as veggies, and it's legal for Congress to classify than as such for tax purposes.

Richard

2007-12-12 08:22:27 · answer #3 · answered by rickinnocal 7 · 0 1

I wouldn't obey them and challenge the Supreme Court.
Then when they rule that a Tomato is a Vegitable, I won't be the one looking like a fool.

2007-12-12 08:13:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

yeah i would probably do what they did back then.....that's tough to imagine too, i would kill myself!

2007-12-12 08:13:43 · answer #5 · answered by Bandolera721 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers