English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why do libs care more about the cost and than the "lives" The only argument they have is the money

2007-12-12 08:05:11 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

HOWDY!!! andy g,

I think money is the only thing or wants it to be the only thing they want money to be brought up; because it is the only thing that PEOPLE like you and I are interested in. The Dem's will raise taxes if they get into the White house, no doubt in my mine. After all PEOPLE like you and I are stupid and don't know anything. After all we down south are nothing but a bunch of RED NECKS. In your case the Dem's think you as a dumb LEATHER NECK. Both of us are proud of what we are called because when you really get down to it we are a RARE BREED!!! and no one have the nerve to do what you and I along with the other Vets. and the ones that serve today do what we have done. From Valley Forge to today's hard core AMERICAN'S.

I was in this county's Air Force and you a Marine. Semper Fi and so long for now.

STAY SAFE!!!
Bulldog

2007-12-12 14:22:06 · answer #1 · answered by BULLDOG 4 · 1 0

Politicians pretend to care about taxes as does the general population so the Libs talk about costs and taxation to bring people onto their side. Sadly lives are cheap and dead veterans do not have a vote.

I think we are all aware now that the Iraq war was bases on wishful thinking at best and lies at worst. The British above all should have realised that democracy is something which developed and can not be imposed. Also once it is lost it can only be regained with considerable difficulty. I make no comment about G W Bush he is your home grown man and I find Blair beyond even abuse in this matter

2007-12-12 08:15:28 · answer #2 · answered by Scouse 7 · 2 4

The Iraq conflict replaced into constructive to 3 and injurious to others. For the anti-terrorists, they sense good for US cracking the Al Qaeda community in Iraq. For Muslims, the Iraq conflict replaced into an attack against their faith. it is your determination, you are able to desire to opt for it extremely is suitable.

2016-10-11 03:50:01 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes the cost of lives, the money spent all for a pack of lies, and yet Bush remains in Office.....there is something dreadfully wrong here.....thanks for making that point.

The U.N. Charter is the same charter that today, the government of the United States is violating in its war on and occupation of Iraq. Since international agreements approved by Congress and signed by the president into law become in effect part of the law of the land, the United States government is violating its own Constitution. The selected regime running the U.S.A. often seems gleeful when it unilaterally shreds international treaties. Veterans repeated over and over, that when they became part of the military, they swore "to protect the Constitution from all enemies both foreign and domestic" while the Bush administration routinely violates that oath.

The veteran who traditionally backs the commander-in-chief is realizing that veterans' benefits are being reduced. Active duty military personnel and their families are seeing that hazard duty pay and even death benefits are being cut back, while the profits for the corporations handed the task of "rebuilding" Iraq go through the roof. Military families are publicly questioning the reasons for the Iraq war. They are asking with their loved ones in arms way why it was necessary to go to pre-emptive war? Why the persistent lying and deception? Conservatives are beginning to question why many of the corporations now involved in Iraq, contrary to law, were given government contracts without the usual bidding process -- another example of cabal policies at the top.

2007-12-12 08:10:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6 4

Why they hate to admit that they make money from the war.They can't have it both ways.Just look at when they want top close a Military base.They'll fight for it because of the loss of revenue for the state economy.

2007-12-12 11:51:17 · answer #5 · answered by ak6702 7 · 1 0

I don't get that. The first concern is the lives of military personnel in an unjust war. Cost in dollars is secondary but still a concern. You can, in time, replace your assets that are lost. You can't the men and women who are dying in Iraq

2007-12-12 08:23:19 · answer #6 · answered by Robert S 5 · 1 3

IIRC I have been posting for 2 years that Women and children are the victims of this attack on Iraq.

And the money if it wasn't for War spending the economy would be down the tubes.

2007-12-12 08:15:36 · answer #7 · answered by Guerilla Liberal fighter 3 · 2 2

BS-- you folks have been shown numerous times that most of the liberal-minded have great disdain for the wasted lives (both US and Iraqi) as well as wasted $$$

Funny the "libs" care more about solvency than the "cons"

2007-12-12 08:10:57 · answer #8 · answered by outcrop 5 · 6 3

Get Dumbya to show up for his first funeral, and I'll believe he gives a s_hit about the soldiers.

2007-12-12 08:18:55 · answer #9 · answered by Beau D. Satva 5 · 2 3

They think that argument will weigh more on the scales of justice.

2007-12-12 08:15:19 · answer #10 · answered by MY NAME MICHELLE I HATE AMERICA 5 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers