2007-12-12 06:33:12 · 12 answers · asked by That Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Blueridge... I am assuming you chose not to answer the question because you couldn't understand it? I'm not sure I remember Laura being President before George ran... do you?
2007-12-12 06:55:58 · update #1
Blue... of course I understood your response. Don't be so niave to believe that Bill has nothing to do with Hillary's popularity. Her numbers are dropping like a rock. If Hillary could do it all on her own merits why is she bringing Billy in?
http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id=183689
Hillary has slim to none in the governing arena. Were it not for her husband she would never get anywhere near the Presidential race. You response doesn't work in this situation.
2007-12-12 07:16:49 · update #2
Again another popularity contest. You know many people are concern on who will be the next president based on who they are and little or no knowledge of what they represent. Just like Opera saying she would vote for Obama to sway votes for the other side. This really shows how people are not concern on whose feet are in the white house but whose shoes are in the white house. They make their vote by face value and not caring about the issues on which the candidate's term would intel. If people today can be at least concern about the kind of people to vote for office, then maybe we can finally vote someone for office who deserves to be in there. and if you ask me I wouldn't ever vote for a woman. There are some things men can do and there are some thing women can't do. Have you ever see women on her pms? Do you want an emotional prone to follow and abide to .?
2007-12-13 16:57:29 · answer #1 · answered by aftershock 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They have obviously been hoping that all those clinton supporting poker chips out there can be cashed in come the election. And sad to say, virtually everyone I talked to who voted for Bill "I never had sexual relations with that woman" Clinton is going to vote for her wrinkly, baggy, socialist, change-her-mind-every-2 mins, nail-on-a-chalkboard-voice, wife-in-title-only.
2007-12-14 03:08:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think they are voting for the icons they think the Clintons represent. Wrong, but what can we do except keep chipping away at them?
2007-12-12 16:36:53 · answer #3 · answered by wider scope 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hillary the reason I voting for barak
2007-12-12 07:03:51 · answer #4 · answered by furgetabowdit 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
probably some of both. There will be the crowd that vote for Hillary simply based on gender, but some will be voting for her on the basis that they liked the man that cheated on her.
2007-12-12 06:44:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Hil and Bill are this nations only hope to avoid the establishment of a repKon created permanent fascist oligarchy.
2007-12-12 06:45:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Did you vote for Laura?
I understood the question perfectly. Apparently, however, you did not understand my response.
2007-12-12 06:43:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
She is annoying as hell! I don't like the way she attacks on Obama...she's sneaky.
2007-12-12 07:33:05 · answer #8 · answered by GRECIA 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Better than voting for someone because supposedly he's an extension of God.
2007-12-12 07:17:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
I could ask a similar question in regards to Guiliani.
2007-12-12 06:55:37 · answer #10 · answered by gone 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋