English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I mean it wasn't the Mormons who started the Inquisition, ran the Crusades, burnt witches or operate the Ku Klux Klan (yeah, I'm looking at you Mike Huckabee,) nor were they involved in the Holocaust, the 30 Years War or a thousand other atrocities committed by Protestants and Catholics in Europe over the centuries.
In fact, it may be that Mormonism is one of the only decent forms of Christianity that has ever existed. Maybe you ought to be adopting whatever it is about them that keeps them from regularly getting involved in the hateful garbage that bogs down so much of the rest of Christianity.
Nobody's religion gets to be immune from scrutiny and criticism. NOBODY'S. If Huckabee thinks he can attack Romney without having to play defense, he better think again ... or does he think he walks on water?

2007-12-12 06:05:44 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

17 answers

Actually, since there is supposed to be no Religious test to become President (as laid down by our Founders). None of the candidates Religions should be questioned.

2007-12-12 06:10:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

There was a Mormon war in the 1800s. But does that reflect on Romney? No.

I don't care what religion he is in the long run. I do care, however, what he stands for and what he plans on doing during Presidency, not what he is going to be doing on Sundays or Saturdays sitting in a pew.

If everyone left his Mormonism alone, this wouldn't be a big deal. But it was brought up, he will defend it, and because he is defending it many think he is fanatical about it. Let it go. Pay attention more to what he stands for instead of what he worships.

2007-12-12 06:12:52 · answer #2 · answered by Fallen 6 · 3 0

i think of faith shouldn't additionally be in the equation for applicants for public place of work. Used to eb a time, while faith replaced right into a private count in this u . s .. Founding Fathers laid it down, there'll be no non secular attempt for public place of work. in simple terms because of the fact Romney felt obliged to come lower back and talk on his faith, would not propose others shoudl be scrutinized. the certainty of the subject is that maximum applicants provide faith lip provider. it extremely is going to likely be a proud day for all individuals while an athiest can run for President, without having to faux she or he particularly follows some faith.

2016-10-11 03:37:11 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I hate to break it to ya,' Gertie, but Baptists had nothing to do with the Crusades, the witch burnings or the KKK. In fact, many of those tortured in the inquisitions and burned as heretics and witches were probably Baptists (or anabaptists).

Many abolitionists were Baptists. Baptists do not consider themselves Protestants, a fact not widely known.

I'm sure that Huckabee would be happy to share his tenets with you. In fact, much happier than to critique the religious beliefs of others, which the press is constantly asking him to do.

2007-12-12 06:21:53 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 1 0

Why are you not attacking Hillary's Obama's, edwards. They all claim to be of the same faith that Huckabee is.

Huckabee is not attacking Romney, this is a last ditch effort by the Romney camp as they are starting to fall.

Harry Reid is a Mormon and thinks we lost this war, maybe mormons aren't good for troop moral.

2007-12-12 06:16:42 · answer #5 · answered by mbush40 6 · 1 1

To even discuss the religion of a candidate is ridiculous. We are not voting for Bishop or Pope we are voting for a secular office and nothing else. Most religions have had a checkered past but that doesn't mean they haven't changed. Most have adapted to modern times, albeit slowly, they no longer burn witches at the stake or sell indulgences. The idea of polygamy is no longer part of the LDS Church. Times change and they have had to adapt. Those religions that have not adapted are either very small or non existant.

2007-12-12 06:14:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

No, actually, NONE of them should be.

I get so tired of people debating about the religions of Presidential candidates in a country that was founded BECAUSE people wanted freedom from that kind of thing.

It's shameful.

2007-12-12 06:09:49 · answer #7 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 5 0

I am more worried about Irish Catholic Drunks that take pride in fixing elections..
so that well for public sector jobs never dries up for them and their nepotists..

"In 1850 at the crest of the Potato Famine immigration, Orestes Brownson, a celebrated convert to Catholicism, stated: "Out of these narrow lanes, dirty streets, damp cellars, and suffocating garrets, will come forth some of the noblest sons of our country, whom she will delight to own and honor."

In little more than a century his prophecy rang true. Irish-Americans had moved from the position of the despised to the oval office."



.

2007-12-12 06:09:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Being from the south east, he has probably become accustomed to the idea that Mormon bashing is just another fair target, but he will find that it has already backfired on him - he just doesn't know it yet.

2007-12-12 06:10:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

If they bring up during the race or the media does, then yes.

2007-12-14 11:52:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers