or will they stay in iraq and show iraquies that this was not about iraqi freedom. this was about occupying iraq and making them slaves to america.
2007-12-12 06:04:52 · 12 answers · asked by antichrist brother555666 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
i want mature answer. if iraq was a democracy shouldent be owned by iraqis not americans
2007-12-12 06:15:07 · update #1
There wouldn't be much of any other choice. Iraq made a law saying that we're not allowed to stay there permanently...
It's their country after all, not ours. If we don't respect their rules there was no point in giving them a democracy to begin with.
2007-12-12 06:10:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i will attempt and help and positioned it into words human beings opt to take heed to. this could get some suggestions flowing, good success. The Iraq war is in its very final point, rooting out the evil that threaten not basically our freedom however the liberty of the Iraq human beings. particular the sacrifice of the lost of stay and the wounded of our brave infantrymen is of great grief to the persons of our great united states of america, their sacrifices is unquestionably not in ineffective and that they only isn't forgotten. We united statesa. and its allies have suffered terrorist assaults and the finished human beings of Iraq that have been liberated from tyranny has grow to be a like a brother that is being bullied via evil persons that prefer to do away with the finished freedom the american human beings has given them and prefer each good brother, we the US will stand and combat for our brother Iraq. whilst we attain Iraq and we can, Iraq would be our allies and a kind for a extra advantageous existence in Iraq and the entire area. God Bless united statesa.
2016-11-03 00:58:45 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, you have no idea what's going on in the world, do you?
First, there is no war in Iraq. Second, the sole objective is to transfer responsibility from Coalition Forces to Iraqi Forces.
It's sad, because you tried so hard to come up with something coherent.
2007-12-12 06:16:04 · answer #3 · answered by DOOM 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Let's get real for minute here...
The US didn't engage in a massive military mobilization, go into trillions of dollars of debt, billions of which went to building military/political compounds inside Iraq that are larger and more complex than the Pentagon - just to turn it all over to anybody.
We're there to stay, for a long, long time.
2007-12-12 06:15:55 · answer #4 · answered by lmn78744 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. We have effectively left the bases we were maintaining in saudi Arabia. One of the ancillary benefits to ousting Saddam is that we intended all along to shift our saudi presence to Iraq. Therefore, we will be maintaining our Iraqi bases for the forseeable future.
2007-12-12 06:27:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
of the US will not! it was all about occupying iraq and making them slaves to america and steal their oil
2007-12-12 06:08:28 · answer #6 · answered by me 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They will stay until Iraq can defend itself, which will probably be a very long time.
2007-12-12 06:08:20 · answer #7 · answered by gerafalop 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely! IF it's about Democracy (but it's not)
2007-12-12 07:43:21 · answer #8 · answered by jbeezz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sure we'll let them have them. Just like we did Germany. Oh wait, no we won't they are ours now.
2007-12-12 06:13:14 · answer #9 · answered by WJ 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
great construction...how many US Bases are there in Iraq?
2007-12-12 06:07:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋