Tories: Do you agree with their comment?

Question

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/pressass/20071212/tuk-force-parents-to-work-say-tories-6323e80_1.html

Please read this. It says they want to force parents back to work. I don't think this is fair. I have an autistic son who I am having great difficulty finding necessary childcare for. These idiotic, tax grabbing, fat, incestuous, public school bum f*cked, lying, stuck up pratts have no idea about how difficult it is as a single parent on bare essentials. They don't care how much harder it will be for people like me to fully support my son. I don't get any maintenance from the father. I had job but had to give it up due to the autism, the nursery couldn't handle him.

Do you agree that we should be forced back to work?

I claim Carers Allowance, yes. I know lots of people who sponge and I don't feel the sort of person who likes to sponge, after all I did have a job - for my sanity! I hated being at home, but should spongers and lazy gits be forced? I think we'll all be lumped into the same group. It's a shame.

Lady SJ the father of my child is in Ireland and therefore 'not in the UK's jurisdiction' how convenient. I can't get money off him god knows I've tried. But thats another story.

Answer 1

I could see their point if, like them, you were packing your kids off to boarding school for the next 10 years, leaving you with loads of free time.

Sadly, though, not all of us can afford private boarding schools and actually take parenting as a seriously as any other full time job.

Answer 2

well as you have a disabled kid, i'm sure they would make an exception, but generally i think it's a good idea. I pay my taxes and expect them to be spent on hospitals etc. not on people who stay on benefits all their lives just because they had a child....i know plenty of people who are single parents, don't get maintenence, and worked from when their child was a year old, if not before. I think it's a perfectly reasonably comment, and i hope labour see sence for once and make it part of law soon. I'm fed up of supporting people who spend their lives sponging off the tax payer just because it's an easy ride and they're too lazy to get a job. If they have a reason, like yourself, then fine, but most people arn't like that, they're just lazy.

Answer 3

in case you could no longer handle on £40 5,000 a twelve months then you particularly are the two ineffective with money or you have a severe coke habit ! I even have lived maximum of my grownup existence & raised 2 little ones, on (alongside with ALL advantages) around £3,000 a twelve months & I controlled. On their volume of money i ought to stay like a queen ! hearth on on each and every occasion i'm chilly, continuously food interior the cabinet, expenses paid on time, nights out, a trip, i might even circulate to the cinema at times. some human beings have no thought how the different a million/2 stay. @L some thing no one EVER mentions is while you're unemployed then your baby income is & continuously has been, deducted out of your unemployment income by using fact it counts as income. subsequently the unemployed are no longer any further valuable off for having baby income, it somewhat is only of use to those that are working. it would make greater experience to end baby income to the unemployed, thereby saving on the forms of value via one branch basically to be deducted via yet another. we could see any baby-kisser attempt to compliment the flow that one !

Answer 4

Find that so frightening. These people haven't a clue what real life can be like. We're all well aware that there's an element of those that take advantage of the system but to bring in daft ideas like this is lunacy, who do you trust to implement these rules with sensitivity. From my experience unemployment can be one of the most tedious and soul destroying predicaments to find yourself in, concentrate in aiding those that need help then crack down on the determined abusers.

Answer 5

If like yourself, your child needs special attention, then no. But to help your case, please go after the father for some money. He should be paying for his off-spring.

But if its just someone dossing round, all day and still sending the child to nursery, then yes they should.

Hope my comment didn't offend you. Good luck if he ever steps foot into this country again. I have a friend in the situation.

Answer 6

In certain circumstances ..Yes. I lived on a council estate for awhile & came across numerous people taking the piss. people in rent free housing of which none of the occupants worked. (well they worked for cash on the side) & I'am paying for it through my taxs. Theres lots of sponges that need to have thier backsides well & truly kicked.

Answer 7

Another one of Cameron`s Gay Boys talking bullsh1t again.
And people actually want to vote this lot into power, makes me cringe at the thought.
Will the Tory idiots pay for the baby-sitters, so all these one parent families can go to work?

I bloody well doubt it!

Typical Tory bullsh1t!

Answer 8

No,you're a carer,I should imagine you'd be an acception. I agree that these young single mums shouldn't be able to get away pumping out baby after baby and expect to be supported but the one's who have had long term relationships or marriages that have fallen apart and have previously worked,they're the ones it's gonna hit aswell.
This is just the start of the Tory policies......think it's bad under Labour?.......just wait!

Answer 9

Welcome to the real Tories.

Of course you should be forced to work.

And you must be a proper parent and be at home too. Or go to prison if your kids skip school.

People like you are a drain on the state and should be kept wondering where your next penny for pot noodle comes from.

Thats the only way that people like you can be made to work.

That means that rich people can be free of tax, giving them pots of money so they chose which brand of caviar to have on their toast,

thats how you get them to work harder you see....

Thats the Tories for you!!!!

R

(lifelong Socialist)

Answer 10

I share your anger. Of course parents shouldn't be forced back to work when their kids are tiny.
The wellbeing of the children MUST come first - not filling the treasury coffers with tax £££s so that they can spend it on more obscene illegal middle-Eastern oil wars.