Hillary says, she will pay $5,000 for each child's savings. Note: you cannot touch that money. Now, the democrats are coming up with a plan: If you have more than two children, you will have to pay $5,000 for each child on your yearly income taxes! What do you think of this plan? Not to mention that since Hillary has been a Senator for NY. She has spent over Five Hundred Million in Pork.
2007-12-12 05:43:54 · 22 answers · asked by Sasha 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
For each additional child, after two.
2007-12-12 05:45:19 · update #1
It is in the Democrats plan for Global Warming, Heard it on NBC and Fox News a few days ago. Guess it is a form of Population Control.
2007-12-12 06:13:55 · update #2
I am probably old enough to be your mother. I am a annalist, also, I use to be a Democrat. Now I am not..
2007-12-12 06:15:28 · update #3
Super star, Guess you don't pay attention to Politics. I don't make up stuff as serious as this.
2007-12-12 06:16:36 · update #4
Yes, She recounted about giving $5,000 for each baby, for their College Savings. This is a new proposal that the Democrats are going to come up with. Hillary is not the only one involved in this. Why give money to the Citizens? When they can make more by putting a Population Control on how many children are born? I am thinking for the future of my Grand Children. And the future for the young people. If you can afford a child, then you should be able to have as many as you want.
2007-12-12 10:26:55 · update #5
How on one hand can Hillary yell about a multi-trillion dollar deficit and then turn around and offer money? This is just another Democrat give away trying to get votes.
There are 300 Million people in the USA. In 2005 we had just over 14 births per 1000. So calculate that out.
300,000,000 people divided by 1000 = 300,000 x 14 births =
4,200,000 births per year in the USA.
4,200,000 x $5000 each = $21,000,000,000 = $21 Billion per year.
So for $21 Billion per year, she gets the votes of both parents, or 8.4 Million votes. And that is just for one year.
If she says she is going to do this for all four years she gets to be president, you can increase that number even more. If you assume people will have two kids, she will get 16.8 Million happy moms and dads in her vote buying scam.
And keep in mind, she says the money would go to the CHILD and the parents could not touch the money. So how is she going to pay for it? By increasing taxes on the parents.
2007-12-12 06:00:49 · answer #1 · answered by forgivebutdonotforget911 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'll go adopt a couple of 17 year olds if that $5,000 is coming out of her own personal Savings account. Otherwise, it's just another ploy to woo parents and milk the public.
2007-12-12 06:25:37 · answer #2 · answered by handlebar knocker 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I heard about the savings part but not the payout part, I'll have to investigate that.
The first idea is really kooky because the money is somehow tied into paying for education.
The idea about paying the government sounds like what China does for population control.
2007-12-12 05:58:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
My favorite part of the Socialized Hillary Care Plan is how Big Tobacco will pay for it.
Then they will ban smoking.
***Q. Then what? (answer below)
Thanks for the heads-up on the $5,000 question. Keep the updates coming.
Take care,
Justin
****A. Taxes
2007-12-12 05:50:32 · answer #4 · answered by Justin 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ya im sick and tired of politicians coming up with all these plans on how to spend my money and tax dollars!! And i am especially offended at them using mine and yours hard earned money as a carrot and a stick proposition!! Its like me taking 30 bucks from you every time you earned a 100 and givin it to someone else who doesnt deserve it! The sad thing there are a lot of sad people out there who actually believe that all this money of ours that politicians throw at them is somehow free money and something they are entitled to.
2007-12-12 05:52:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Both plans suck! The stupid politicians will say anything to get elected and most people will believe them, because, saddly, they are too stupid/lazy to ask any intelligent questions regarding their planned spending sprees.
2007-12-12 05:50:32 · answer #6 · answered by CatNip 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's an idea she mentioned once, then dropped when she realized people didn't support it and the logistics just wouldn't work out.
2007-12-12 05:46:41 · answer #7 · answered by monicanena 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If that goes through, I'll look into how I can be born once a month for the rest of my life.
2007-12-12 05:48:11 · answer #8 · answered by open4one 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Each day dawns a little darker for the Hillster....
She soon will be in a tailspin.
2007-12-12 05:47:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
She dropped this idea months ago. The rest of your post is pure nonsense that you made up.
2007-12-12 05:48:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋