50-50.
2007-12-13 07:02:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
between 2 international locations? i think of that is very low, in line with probability one or 2. The 'strategic' and the 'tactical' income of nuclear weapons is long considering previous. Nuclear weapons weren't in any respect designed for use on a onesy/twosy foundation. for the time of the chilly war, it became the prospect of 'at the same time certain distruction' that stored the two nuclear powers at bay. With the tip of the chilly war, this attitude has no place and making use of a nuclear weapon to attack your enemy is senseless. you won't be able to hit them with a nuke and then do something. You wreck that area for miles around, particular, yet now what? however the 1st area of your question, 'What are are the opportunities of a nuclear attack' i think of is fairly intense. you do not contain 'international locations' and you decrease the variety to a minimum of one celebration. i think of that is in all probability extra alongside the strains of an 8, even a 9. There are communities, not international locations unavoidably, yet communities that could desire to truly opt to get their palms on a nuclear weapon and set it off in Jerusalem, Washington, long island. or l. a.. unquestionably like it, like it, like it. There could be no 'united states of america' to blame, in simple terms the gang and those persons are insane sufficient to welcome the hell that could desire to rain down on them as a effect. We have been in contact that Saddam became attempting to initiate up his nuke software not because of the fact HE might use a nuke, yet because of the fact he might sell that nuke to somebody who might. we've an identical concern approximately N. Korea and the Russian mafia. (We nevertheless won't be able to account for all Soviet nuclear warheads.) i think of that that probability is fantastically much a certainty and whilst it occurs that is going to run your day like not something you have ever imagined.
2016-11-03 00:56:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would prefer speak of risk.
What's the risk of nuclear war within the next 50 years.
I would say 70%.
Why ?
- US keeps on behaving as the world's cop, while being unable to respect human rights within its own territories.
- sames US, still considers the earth as being its own personal resources, despite the rights of all other earth inhabitants's rights.
- extremisms of all kind keep on pushing people to fight against the others, instead of finding solutions in its own.
- climate problems will stress all problems.
- religion and money aswell are utilised to justify any decision.
- mundialisation has destroyed all Values that people could have.
This drives pour people to think that life is easier any where else then where they live. So they're not proud anymore of their roots.
Rich people -as they're stresses to earn more and more money - think that the money they have give them the right to do what the want,a s soon as they pay for it.
- every one cares for him self only: family, friends, and other human beeing count for nothing.
. . .
2007-12-12 05:52:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Although some countries have nuclear weapons, we have not heard of any of them threatening to wipe off the map any other country. Of course, it will be a different story if those making threats develop the bomb....
2007-12-12 09:53:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Millie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Very high, unfortunately. The opposing parties during the Cold War were rational enough that they didn't want to risk it. Certain factions within Islam seem to have suppressed the survival instinct.
2007-12-12 05:44:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by The First Dragon 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Pretty darned good, considering the fact that India, Pakistan, and now Iran are developing nuclear technology.
2007-12-12 05:42:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
You can't really tell right now. Usually attacks like that come unexpectedly. . . .
2007-12-12 05:43:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Fluppy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
God will step in before man destroys himself and earth
2007-12-12 06:15:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jake 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
100%.
2007-12-12 06:18:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
80%.
2007-12-14 14:46:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by STEPHEN R 5
·
0⤊
0⤋