They both look like welfare to me.
2007-12-12 05:04:16 · 6 answers · asked by Guerilla Liberal fighter 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Maybe the poor person can't afford cheese
And the Banker can't afford a new Gulfstreme IV
2007-12-12 05:05:36 · update #1
Looks like spell check made an acception.
I do have a habit of clicking change without looking at what is being changed.
Thanks to your warnth and compassion I will be able to get into a 12 step mindless spellchecker addiction program
2007-12-12 05:12:40 · update #2
Welfare received by a Republican is good. Welfare received by someone who needs it is bad.
Didn't you catch the memo on Fox News?
2007-12-12 05:12:47 · answer #1 · answered by buffytou 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well for one a poor person can actually get the cheese whereas Bush has not bailed out a single bank. The only thing he has done is call for a rate freeze which hurts the banks not bail them out. They will teach you basic economics when you get to the fifth grade.
2007-12-12 13:13:42 · answer #2 · answered by Brandon A 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A poor person ACTUALLY accepts the cheese. The banks were not bailed out by Bush.
So, by deductive reasoning, one can assume that one of the things you mention is real, the cheese thing, and one is not.
mmmmkay.
2007-12-12 13:08:53 · answer #3 · answered by MrOrph 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Magnitude.
2007-12-12 13:07:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If one "excepts" the infamous "government cheese" that means one does not accept it...
2007-12-12 13:06:58 · answer #5 · answered by outcrop 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Banks can buy off politicians.
2007-12-12 13:06:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋