English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The inquiry into the behavior of the CIA could be cut extremely short if we were to submit the top officials to their own enhanced interrogation methods. According to the CIA, "water boarding technique lasted an average of 14 seconds before caving in". Imagine how much time and resources could be saved if they were put through these same 'non-torture' techniques. The CIA officials themselves should not object to this type of questioning since i'm sure that they would not do unto others what they would not have done to them.

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/Investigation/story?id=1322866

2007-12-12 04:46:01 · 5 answers · asked by kijarra m 3 in News & Events Current Events

5 answers

Bravo!

Start with Dick Cheney.

2007-12-12 04:52:25 · answer #1 · answered by lunatic 7 · 1 0

Um, they are basing it off of many distinctive components. previous interrogators have often written books approximately organising a rapport with the guy you're attempting to get assistance out of has worked extra advantageous. Hayden, on the different hand, has an schedule at the back of asserting that those innovations worked: HE USED THEM. He has to preserve those innovations because of the fact if he would not he looks like a criminal. He knows besides as all and sundry that the muse for torture is to instill terror, to not get assistance out of somebody, considering most of the help won has been shown fake later on, dropping time, funds, and attempt. Edit: you're beginning your self up for this. you're precise, Goss became the CIA director for the time of the fairly some time that this became happening, possibly even maximum of it (we actually don't be attentive to whilst it started, and we in all probability in no way will), Hayden became throughout area of that factor. i don't care how small of a timeframe that became (could 2006 to the tip of the final administration isn't any small time), the Bush administration appointed him because of the fact they needed to get somebody who might espouse their perspectives. previous that, from April 21, 2005–could 26, 2006 he became the critical Deputy Director of national Intelligence, yet another place he won because of the fact of his inherent perspectives on torture. you opt to act like i'm "incorrect as commonly used," you have have been given matters.

2016-11-03 00:49:03 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

try doing their job for a day! they are dealing with people that would want to kill any other human being regardless of the background and individuals that don't wish to live.

so they have to convince them that life is worth living and then get the information, not a easy job. knowing other peoples lives depend on the information you get, if it was my family at risk (which its all our families) then sometimes people have to do shitty things for the greater good, they cant be beaten so they must be joined

2007-12-12 05:11:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i'll never understand people like you.why object to getting information in any way possible?the life that's saved could be yours.
if you think the terrorists should not be treated meanly then i suggest we behead them immediatly that way we will treat them exactly as we are treated.

2007-12-12 06:31:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Great idea, but dont think that is going to happen!

2007-12-12 04:54:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers