Because they have Publicly stated that the American Troops have Lost the War. That the American Troop are Criminals, and Killers of Women and Children.
The Democrats have Bet their Future CONTROL OF OUR COUNTRY on their predictions that Our AMERICAN TROOPS CAN NOT WIN AGAINST THE ISLAMIC TERRORISTS.
Therefor, they need American to lose the War, and they continue to lie, insult and do all they can to cause America to lose the War. In this, they are aided by the Liberal, America Hating Press and Other Media.
When things were bad in Iraq, the Front Pages of the Papers were covered with the News. The same for ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and others.
Now that We are winning, You see that there is no NEWS being printed or shown. Why? Because it does not further their Cause and Objectives.
Years ago these People and Organizations would be considered to be Aiding and Abetting the Enemy, and would be Tried as Traitors to Their Own Country.
2007-12-12 04:41:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sentinel 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Could you compile a list of the Alqaeda members they have defended? I am assuming you are talking about the hesitancy to put anymore money into this occupation of Iraq. Bush wants more money. Maybe he should put effort into the monies lost,squandered and pissed away. Maybe he should have lessened the amount spent on the decadent,hedonistic embassy he had built. Maybe before he lied and sent the troops in he should have done better research and outfitted them as they deserved. Doesn't matter how you say it or how often This is totally on Bush and his regime.
2007-12-12 04:56:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by gone 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
not compelling; on the time of the movements, a state of war did not exist. besides, i'm not so particular that they meet the conventional of secret agent. Had this exceeded off AFTER the war on Terror had started, you will have had a case. yet that's not dereliction of duty except the suspects are fairly allowed to flow loose interior of united statesa.. in the event that they stay in custody and not in any respect get out, that is not dereliction of duty, and for this reason your grounds for impeachment are wiped out.
2016-11-03 00:44:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by lanman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They don't defend Al-Qeada, they just have had to align themselves more to the impression for a Defeat in Iraq as campaign platform of the far left...The impression is costing them, though as more and more Dem's are starting to distance themselves from the far left Moveon-or takeover.
2007-12-12 04:41:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by garyb1616 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Which member of Congress spent a month on CNN attributing the killings in Haditha to the Marines while it was fairly obvious Al-Queda was the responsible party?
Still no apology.
2007-12-12 04:40:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Doctor DNC 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
here's an interesting 'question.'
take a look at the details of the asker of the question - he has less than 50 points total - which means that this id was created just to ask this question on the assumption that it would be removed for violations very soon.
then notice the first two comments don't really say anything other than sort of blindly supporting the 'question,' saying things like 'yeah, what he said.'
these are probably written by the same guy under different id's - this is called point-gaming.
whenever you see these exceedingly transparant and inflammatory questions - it almost ALWAYS fits this exact same profile.
now i wonder why that would be...
2007-12-12 04:28:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by nostradamus02012 7
·
7⤊
3⤋
This is a silly question, as, no Democratic leader defends the terrorist group Al Qaeda.
2007-12-12 04:39:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by alphabetsoup2 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
Because after the democrats say something they have to support no matter if it is a lie or not. Like for instance "the surge isn't working"....i'm sorry but all reports from Iraq has said it is. Typical liberal ideas, support the ACLU, but forget the people who have saved their butts, the soldiers.
And 428 Moore, you are clearly an elitist that thinks that only (start smug voice) the educated and intellectuals should have a vote (end smug voice).
2007-12-12 04:32:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by doughboy_woohoo 2
·
3⤊
5⤋
Why do you lie like that? Are you part of the republical Cabal that warned Osama Bin Laden that the missile were headed his way in 1998? Treason!!!!
2007-12-12 04:37:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by donner 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
Some examples of this would help your question. With no examples, you just look like another Republican parroting another talking point that has no basis in fact....
2007-12-12 04:44:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by slykitty62 7
·
1⤊
2⤋