2007-12-12 04:21:32 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Guliani has a bombastic personality. Thompson a drippy "conservative" type.
Romney would work hard as a President, and, so would Huckabee, I think. Neither would be as devisive as the other front runners, it would seem.
Hillary might be an invitation for bashing, but, I honestly doubt Repubs would go easy on any Dem as president. Obama might be the best here, as, less devisiveness is the basis of his candidacy.
2007-12-12 04:25:51 · answer #1 · answered by alphabetsoup2 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Most of the Democrats would. Hillary and Dennis are probably the only two that wouldn't. As for the Republicans there seems to be splits within their party but Thompson and Tancredo seem to be the least controversial and thus less likely to continue to split the country.
2007-12-12 04:49:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ford became a placeholder. each physique interior the country became exhausted after vietnam and watergate and easily needed to get on with their lifes. Ford extra healthy the bill as an inoffensive entity that could desire to be skipped over. Ford became chosen via Nixon as vp precisely because of the fact he became universally unoffensive. we don't prefer a placeholder after Bush, we prefer a prudent grownup and that i don't see any adults making use of for the activity to this factor with the conceivable exception of Mcain.
2016-11-03 00:44:15 · answer #3 · answered by lanman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say that McCain is the best candidate running at this time, and Huckabee is the second best.
McCain is the only Candidate with war experience, he has fought in war first hand, and was a POW as well. He has the knowledge and experience that we need in office to end this war safely, and victoriously.
2007-12-12 04:36:08 · answer #4 · answered by TEXASmommy 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Wish something like this were possible. Some of the greatest Presidents could not "unite" the country. Too many different concerns, promises and world problems.
2007-12-12 04:28:58 · answer #5 · answered by edubya 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Democrat - I'm beginning to lean Obama ...away from Hillary ... I think I'd rather have a guy with little experience then someone who was "tied into" the system
Republican- The only one I would even consider voting for would be McCain or Rudy. I like McCain alot. Probably the only Republican that could win me over .. and I am quite Lib
2007-12-12 04:26:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
I think the uniters would be:
Dem: Maybe Obama, but i'll be honest. With Pelosi, Reid, Hoyer, and Schumer in there, I doubt there will be much bi-partisanship.
Rep: Huckabee, Giuliani. Both candidates have shown that they can attract both party votes and work for everyone.
2007-12-12 04:47:03 · answer #7 · answered by doughboy_woohoo 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I do think that Obama has the best theory of management. It is a question of whether it is just election rhertoric. I think that McCain has the best background and potential of the Republicans but his age concerns me as well as his attitude on Iraq.
2007-12-12 04:29:39 · answer #8 · answered by Tom E 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Obama for the Democratic side. I really couldn't tell you what Republican would be successful. None of them seem to be willing to compromise at all.
2007-12-12 04:40:53 · answer #9 · answered by slykitty62 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Obama for the democrats, an easier pill to swallow vice Hillary
McCain for the republicans, he is almost a democrat.
2007-12-12 04:25:24 · answer #10 · answered by libsticker 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋