I completely agree with
(MARGARET)
England
"I AM SORRY, BUT A MAN HAVING AN EMBRYO IMPLANTED INTO HIS CAVITY IS NOT ONLY IMMORAL AND SRICKLEY SINFULLY AGAINST THE BIBLE BUT IS SELFISH TO THE POOR CHILD WHOME HAS TO BE BORN FROM A MAN.IF YOU TAKE PLACE IN THE TYPE OF RESEARCH, YOU WILL SUFFER THE CONS. FROM THE LORD AND MILLIONS OF PEOPLE.THIS IS DISCUTTING AND CRUEL TO THE BABY.............HOW WOULD YOU FEEL IF YOU WERE THE CHILD?????SICKO!!!!!THIS MAN WILL SUFFER THE CONSEQEUNCES OF TAKING PLACE IN THIS TYPE OF SICKO RESEARCH.....YOU ALL SHOULD BE SHTTTTTTTTTT"
it's unnatural and maybe unsafe in the end. I think it's great that science has evolved thus far, but how is a man laboring a child sanificant to the human race . . . unless men want to exterminate women . . . .
beside men could never fully endure a woman's experience while laboring a child, it's a mother's rite of passage to bring life to their beloved child.
2007-12-12 03:31:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Amanda Ann 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I have heard of a pregnant man, however not in the same manner as the man you linked us to.
Well I heard that a man was a hermaphrodite (both male and female organs, however he was generally more 'male').
He could release eggs like women, except he didn't have a womb for the baby to remain in during pregnancy, the fertilized egg attached itself to his small intestine instead of a womb, and developed. I think he managed around 7 months of pregnancy, then they had to do a Cesarean (because there was no channel for the baby to be delivered through) and voila, he had a child.
I've sort of forgotten many of the details as I heard this story a while back.
2007-12-12 03:33:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
That is too weird.I wouldn't really think that it could be possible, a man doesn't have a uterus.Hope it is fake,it seems so unnatural.I can understand a man wanting to have that same connection to a baby in the womb(although I haven't heard a man actually say they want to be pregnant.):)
2007-12-12 03:43:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by superstar 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I heard about that before. I even see a real picture of real man who was prgnant before and I'm not kidding. If you watch Medical Incredible on Discovery Channel, you will see some weird things too. I've seen men with uterus and ovaries on that show. Don't know it happens.
2007-12-12 03:54:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Diamond C. 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
HE'S NOT PREGNANT!! =]
At first glance, it may look as if Bhagat had given birth. Actually, Mehta had removed the mutated body of Bhagat's twin brother from his stomach. Bhagat, they discovered, had one of the world's most bizarre medical conditions -- fetus in fetu. It is an extremely rare abnormality that occurs when a fetus gets trapped inside its twin. The trapped fetus can survive as a parasite even past birth by forming an umbilical cordlike structure that leaches its twin's blood supply until it grows so large that it starts to harm the host, at which point doctors usually intervene.
http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?id=2346476
2007-12-12 03:26:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Weird.
2007-12-12 03:26:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by snowboardchick01 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
that was a complete scam from a few years ago. that man was never pregnant its not possible for men to get pregnant and sustain a pregnancy
2007-12-12 03:27:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by kleighs mommy 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well if it's good enough for Arnie....
Joke! I think it's a load of rubbish. How does the baby get it's nutrients?
Made up website I reckon...
2007-12-12 03:28:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This story has been going around for 7 years now. It's not real. Go to www.snopes.com
2007-12-12 03:27:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Squirrel 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Wow, can it be real? I read about it from your link, but is it real? I don't like that idea....Women have uteruses. We are supposed to carry the babies and give birth. Not natural for a man to.....
2007-12-12 03:33:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋