If someone has full physical and legal custody, and the other party just has visitation (supervised). The custody parent hasn't given the non-custodial parent (The supervised one) any information for school grades, but the non-custodial parent hasn't even asked about the kid's or how there doing.
Why do people think that the custody parent has to give information when there the one that has FULL control and the non custodial parent LOST those rights...? The custody parent isn't WITHOLDING information but the
2007-12-12 03:12:26 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
The non custodial parent can still call the school to get that information. Unless their rights have been terminated, they can still have access to that information. If they dont even care enough to ask about the kids grades or school performance, that says a lot about them. You are not required to keep them informed. They can certainly do that themselves.
2007-12-12 03:53:43 · answer #1 · answered by SKITTLES 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps the custodial parent should attempt to help the non-custodial parent be a better parent by keeping him/her informed of grades and all. Not legally required to do so but it is the right thing to do.
Just because someone else doesn't do the right thing doesn't mean one doesn't have to either.
Just a thought.
2007-12-12 03:21:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
This is where you are wrong. You don't have ABSOLUTE rights to the children. You have custody but the other parent still has parental rights and hasn't had them terminated so he still has rights to know what is going on with his children.
2007-12-12 03:54:41 · answer #3 · answered by lahockeyg 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sounds like a "power play" to me. I can't see what harm there is in relating info to the non-custodial parent. Costs nothing.
2007-12-12 03:37:24 · answer #4 · answered by sensible_man 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋