How many times will Liberals trot out this Lie about the Bush Admin supposedly lying?

Question

When are they actually going to show any proof to support this. They keep trotting out this tired old lie of theirs that Bush lied about WMD, but ignore the fact Bill Clinton said and believed the same, why is it only a lie if a Republican says it but not a Democrat? Do they OK a lie from a Dem because they are blinded but call the same thing a lie from a Rep because they are so twisted with anger at their own country and President, they would rather hurt their own nation than stand together to defeat the terrorist's in time of War. That's called TREASON and Dems are guilty of it.

Constapato "As many times as you keep putting this crap on here." Do you only say that when a Con posts something but ignore it when libs post "How man times will bush & members of his administration lie to the American people before you've had enough?" thats called being a hypocrite

Scourge_of_Fascism, thats pretty flimsy, he lied about Rumsfield staying in place! come on you need to do better than that.

Mr PhD (there is a false statement for a start) "A lie is still a lie no matter how many times you repeat it or how many times you deny it. " So thats why libs lie so much about the Bush Admin they hope it sticks ?

Mmm so far only a few intelligent people have answered, the usual boring libs with their lies and posting links to lying websites, thinking that backs what they say, why are they so guillible ?

Answer 1

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

Answer 2

Liberals fall into one of three categories. First are the one who know Bush did not lie but say so anyway for political advantage. The Second know Bush did not lie and do not say he did. The Third have no idea what they are talking about and just repeat whatever the first category Liberals say.

I know it is frustrating but that is the nature of the beast. For the fist category Liberals, the left leaning, socialist inspired Liberals, winning elections and the power it brings is all that matters. Whom they destroy, whom they mis-lead, what damage they do to the process does not matter. All that matters is power. Once the power is achieved all that matters is holding on to it and increasing it.

If you go back in history you will see that issues like banning school prayer or legalizing unlimited abortions was never, ever going to happen by voter demand. Once these new wave Liberals got into positions of power, they did not hesitate to simply by-pass the voters and bring these unpopular issues directly to a very Liberal and Activist Supreme Court. Thereby shoving these issues down the general public's throat.

As much as I hated seeing prayer removed from school, as much as I hated seeing unlimited abortion mandated, what I hated then and still hate today is the way the Liberals went about it.

These people will do whatever it takes to force their minority views on everyone else. If that means filibustering presidential appointments that would be approved if brought to a vote or keeping the Senate open so the President cannot make recess appointiments, they will use any ruse, break any rule or violate any agreement as long as it achieves their stated goal.

Merry Christmas!

.

Answer 3

nicely Bush suggested that Saddam and Bin encumbered have been friends. in certainty wasn't Saddam training Bin encumbered's adult adult males for him? Now any histroy pupil who has studied the midsection East may be responsive to that Bin encumbered hated Saddam and Saddam's ideology and gadget in Iraq. in certainty Bin encumbered hated that Iraq allowed Christianity and distinctive styles of religion. So why did George Bush insist there became a link between the two? Has he be responsive to get admission to to training that any historic previous pupil has? What are his advisers doing? What with regard to the Iraq 9/11 link? various human beings have claimed that the Bush administration have been stated that Iraq had not something to do with 9/11 yet Bush persevered to point Iraqi links to 9/11? Wait a minute! Are those particularly truths or is this basically greater B U l l S H i t?

Answer 4

Here are the results of a quick search. Se the details of the GW admins lies for yourself.

Quotes from Clinton in 1998 are as a result of conflicts on weapons inspections, all taken out of context as is the usual foolishness that repubs use to justify their foolish beliefs. U.S. inspectors finally reported that is was believed that Saddam had no capability to build weapons of mass destruction, and that before the invasion by GW there was no evidence that Saddam was capable of producing weapons of mass destruction. The neocons faked the evidence, and this has been well recorded, and anyone who wants to take the time can prove it from the record.

Notice the neocons never have any relevent links to back up their nonsense and ridiculous claims.

Answer 5

BECAAAAUUUUUUSE.. They were with him before they were against him. remember how colin Powell was an idot tool for Bush until he started disagreeing with him? Remember how the intel reports about WMDs was a big lie (cause Bush acted on it) but the nukes in Iran is the truth (because Bush said they are a danger)

Answer 6

No treason is obstructing terrorism investigations. Like the ones going on in Minneapolis in the weeks before 911! Why did FBIHQ deny FISA warrants requested by its field agents in the weeks before 911?
I mean Bush was warned a month before the attacks if he wanted to keep America safe why did the justice department deny those requests???????
The administration had NO problem prosecuting Moussaoui though did it??????
Here is a Bush lie.........About outing Plame."Anyone in my administration who would do this will be fired and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law!"
Then he commutted Libbys sentence for being too harsh for lying to a federal grand jury!

Answer 7

apparently explaining this is on par with trying to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig. But I'll try nonetheless.
It is immaterial whether or not he twisted the Intel to justify invading Iraq. The very fact that he conducted a pre-emptive strike against that country makes his act a crime on the international stage as defined by long established international laws.
As for the assertion that we are fighting terrorists that's so BS, Iraq never had anything to do with terrorism but Saudi Arabia, Yemen, UAE and Iran did.
Bush's agenda is fairly transparent, he established a presence in the middle east to assure that America will have oil as long as oil is there to be had.

Answer 8

Well, if I recall correctly, Clinton did think there were WMD in Iraq, but Hans Blix kept on repeating that he wasn't finding anything, yet the Bush administration kept insisting they were there. So the invasion took place and they didn't find anything.

Frankly that makes the administration look like it was manufacturing evidence for what ultimately wasn't there.

Answer 9

bush and his administration are liars! Here's a list of JUST the top 10 lies. you can deny reality all you want, it is never going to change the truth.

Answer 10

Bush is a stinking liar, who lied about the reasons for invading Iraq. He sucks big time, dude. Why do you waste your time defending this incompetent moron? He will go down as one of the worst presidents in America's history, and you true believers keep defending him. Give it up and move on to more productive pursuits. next question.

Answer 11

When GWB told us Saddam had WMD,that is what our Intel told us.So Pres.Bush was telling us the truth. As it turned out we did not find the massive stockpiles we thought we would find. So we had inaccurate Intel,which is bad but not a lie.Dems follow the same rule that Hitler followed..........tell a lie often enough and eventually people will believe it.