I know many of you will slam the pope for this, but he's a VERY respectable voice. More and more high-ups are echoing his comments. What do you think?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=501316&in_page_id=1811&ito=1490
2007-12-12 01:32:10 · 16 answers · asked by Robert S 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Global warming is a scientific issue.
Explain to me why I should listen to the Pope and ignore the scientist in regards to a scientific issue.
2007-12-12 04:18:46 · answer #1 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
worldwide warming is in all probability getting used as a scare tactic via the liberals, yet that would not advise that is not happening. The figures let us know that the earth fairly is warming up. that is basically a question of what's inflicting it. it may desire to be an ingredient of a organic cycle that occurs over thousands of years - we don't fairly be attentive to because of the fact we've not been keeping documents long sufficient. We do be attentive to nevertheless issues like drilled out ice cores in Greenland and Antarctica that at one time the earth became warmer than it fairly is now and that we've long previous via cycles of warming up and cooling down, so in line with probability this warming is in simple terms area of that. We arrogantly have a tendency to think of that we as human beings are the reason at the back of each thing that occurs in the worldwide and that we are going to be that is downfall. i don't advise to burst anyones bubble, yet we and our human events are fairly puny once you study them to mom nature and the cosmos at super. there is data to point that this worldwide warming is fairly brought about via fluctuation in sunspot pastime. The Martian polar icecaps have been suggested to be melting and receding. No SUVs or factories on Mars final I heard LOL. The sunspot pastime clarification makes the main sense to me considering GW has been suggested in places different than our earth.
2016-11-03 00:24:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
he knows it's a ploy by the Rothschild s to get the goyim to agree to their own repression and surveillance while they make a fortune out of increased taxation . The current Pope would need to be careful he doesn't go the way of John Paul I who wanted to clean out the Rothschild run Vatican Bank.
BTW there is NO definitive evidence of man-cause GW , in fact the ice caps on Mars are melting too obviously like our climate changes being caused by solar activity .
2007-12-12 02:38:25 · answer #3 · answered by John M 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not as long as Al Gore can make money off of scaring the crap out of people.
And the Pope readily admits that Catholicism is a religion, unlike Mr. Gore with man-made global warming.
2007-12-12 01:40:03 · answer #4 · answered by DOOM 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Will it quiet the scare tactics, NO. It's one of the main scare tactics of the left, just like the left said that the threat of another terrorist attack was a scare tactic of the right. Unfortunately, I don't think there will ever be a consensus on what to do about protecting the environment until we get the subject out of the hands of politicians.
2007-12-12 01:45:00 · answer #5 · answered by The Master 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I am a Roman Catholic and I believe that the Pope is a Nazi. This is the same Pope that says that the Catholic Church is the only true church and all the rest are pretenders. This is the person that says that homosexuls should not be allowed into seminaries. I have no love for this Pope and I really miss John Paul II. BTW: He was a Nazi, look up his history.
2007-12-12 01:41:19 · answer #6 · answered by White Star 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
I don't follow the pope nor his side of Christianity but at least he is standing and speaking the truth about humans and the warming issues.
2007-12-12 01:46:11 · answer #7 · answered by Boomrat 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The Pope is a wise man
2007-12-12 01:45:44 · answer #8 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
How much did the oil industry donated to the catholic church?
BTW he needs to bring some empirical evidence of God first before he requests evidence of global warming, otherwise he would be the biggest hypocrite ever.
2007-12-12 02:34:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
So, he's the pope of a religion for which there is no proof or evidence, and he's complaining of people not providing proof or evidence? That's weird.
2007-12-12 01:36:24 · answer #10 · answered by leaptad 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋