Google it, Yahoo it, even Ask Jeeves if you really want to, but just make sure you choose a link with ".au" at the end of the URL -- ".au" suggests an Australian website (you probably already knew, but oh well) and is likely to be a more reliable information source for you. (The platypus is one of the most awesome animals that you could do a project for, so that's a high five for you :P) Good luck!
2007-12-12 00:43:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by kinsey07 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Google, wikipedia, yahoo.. Just about any where on the Internet with a search engine.
2007-12-12 00:40:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Search it out on the net using google or some other search engine. Maybe Wikkipedia?
2007-12-12 00:39:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rocknrollrich 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The fossil checklist isn't overly good. As others have suggested, the closest residing kinfolk are the two genera of echidnas; Zaglosssus and Tachyglossus. a nearer fossil relative is a genus called Obdurodon. it extremely is totally plenty platy-like (extremely than echidna-like) yet, between different variations, it retained cheek enamel as an grownup. grownup platys get rid of their enamel. Obdurodon replaced into chasing shrimp something like twenty million years in the past. Going further lower back issues get much less sparkling and extra arguable. some experts view a pair of decrease Cretaceous and Paleocene monotremes as being extra heavily appropriate with platys than echidnas and, if amazing, that would desire to intend the final problem-loose ancestor of residing monotremes replaced into approximately over one hundred twenty five million years in the past. i'm no longer a consultant myself yet, in spite of the certainty that, do no longer settle for that view as being amazing. Fossil jaw bones from Australia, inclusive of from a genus called Teinolophos, have a hypertrophied mandibular canal on their jaw that still seems for platys (much less progressed for echidnas), and its linked with the magnificent perceptive skills of the beak. it extremely is complete of many hundreds of mechano- and electro-receptors that enable the platy to seek in water with its eyes close. consequently, say a number of, Teinolophos wasn't in effortless terms a monotreme. it extremely is an early member of Ornithorhynchidae; the monotreme kinfolk containing the platy yet no longer the echidnas! a topic I see with it extremely is as follows. Echidnas have a much less progressed (or possibly deteriorated) loving for mechano- and electro-receptors of their beaks, and detecting electric powered impulses is something ultimate accomplished in water. those terrestrial animals are wandering around with thought kit that would not artwork ok, seeing as they do no longer stay in water. that would desire to make experience to me in the event that they have been secondarily terrestrial descendants of semi-aquatic ancestors. In this style of case, their ancestor could have got here upon a hypertrophied manibular canal smart. hence, i'm no longer confident it extremely is a function that would desire to've been constrained to ornithorhynchid monotremes. consequently, i'm unconvinced approximately Teinolophos (and others) being ornithorhynchids extremely than extra basal monotremes.
2016-10-11 03:12:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Search it on google or ask. com. You could also try searching the library.
2007-12-12 00:39:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Runner 09 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platypus
2007-12-12 00:51:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
you can go to wikipedia for free or microsoft encarta(need to buy)
2007-12-12 00:40:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
http://www.rainforest-australia.com/platypus.htm
2007-12-12 00:40:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by sparks9653 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
at the Australian zoo
2007-12-12 00:39:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by david p 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
wikipedia.com
2007-12-12 00:38:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by I love soup... 2
·
0⤊
0⤋