2007-12-12 00:29:01 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Because the U.S.A. is currently saddled with a corrupt and incompetent administration. Perhaps after January 2009, the government will begin behaving in a more responsible manner.
2007-12-12 00:40:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
Because it is a biased, Commie document, transferring wealth from the productive to the parasitic. It has no scientific validity whatsoever. None of its signatories comply. They are just hypocritical Bush bashers, as is the asker. The biggest polluters, China and India, get special privileges. Only a traitor or Democrat would support US enactment.
2007-12-12 08:49:27 · answer #2 · answered by buttfor2007 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It's a seriously flawed treaty. It does nothing to slow down China and India's every growing pollution problem for example. If we join there will be no incentive to fix it.
2007-12-12 08:33:21 · answer #3 · answered by Yo it's Me 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
We're not convinced the economic trade offs required of us will aid enough to ofset the damage being done by other countries
2007-12-12 08:36:27 · answer #4 · answered by wizjp 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because it's a bogus treaty.
2007-12-12 08:36:57 · answer #5 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
can you say contracted extortion?
i knew you could.
would you do such, willingly?
2007-12-12 09:04:59 · answer #6 · answered by daddio 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋