2007-12-11 23:58:19 · 6 answers · asked by stefany 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
sorry i ment Moral
2007-12-12 00:05:45 · update #1
Moral: not to be amoral.
EDIT: Do excuse me, but I was being very simplistic in my answer to you. The book is highly multi-faceted, as only Anthony Burgess can be (well, as he can write that way)-- and "morals" to the tale pretty much race by in Clockwork language.
Just do your best if this is homework.
2007-12-12 00:12:01 · answer #1 · answered by LK 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The moral is right at the end. Alex has been through the entire ordeal of reprogramming and been cured of that. All of his friends are absorbed by the system and he is even embracing his new destiny while looking down at the very thing he used to be. Violent and Sociopathic, Alex has come full circle from being an outsider and thug, to being part of the system that keeps producing people like him. Systematic Violence can be an effective tool for producing desired results, but it propagates violence. It may just show up in a different form
2007-12-12 08:59:52 · answer #2 · answered by fractalarmor 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The book questions morality in general. Many morals, protect 1 group of people at the expense of another. In doing so, the balance of power is shifted. but that alone doesnt make the world any better off, & may make actually make things worse. If we are willing to always sacrifice the individual to protect the mass's...the good is lost with the bad. Life itself might then become unbearable.
2007-12-12 08:42:23 · answer #3 · answered by insignificant_other 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I dont know but wow what a trippy movie
2007-12-12 08:04:10 · answer #4 · answered by Turkish 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bad is to the Bone.
2007-12-12 08:18:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You can't rehabilitate psychopaths. They are who they are and will never change.
2007-12-12 08:17:17 · answer #6 · answered by DAR76 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋