English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

LONDON (Reuters) - Half of Britons think it is okay to target civilians in war, according to a survey commissioned by the International Committee of the Red Cross.

http://uk.yahoo.com/r/nw/fd/6/*http://uk.news.yahoo.com/rtrs/20071212/tpl-uk-britain-war-survey-43a8d4f_2.html


....its a great leap from it being okay to hunt down and kill dictators (and their family) to THIS isnt it????

2007-12-11 22:10:26 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

20 answers

This is very a disappointing read. My heart always goes out to the innocent victims of war - people need to take a step back and think exactly what it must be like to live your life day in day in a war zone, not knowing if you, your children and your family will survive - that is how many people across the world lead their lives. Although britons have things to moan about we live in relative safety and we should all be grateful for that. It seems so hypocritical to me that the US and UK forces have killed so many innocent people in the name of literating (westernising countries against their will/going in for the oil) and yet, we are scathing when our own die in terrorist attacks. Is it any wonder we are seen as hypocrites by terrorists?

2007-12-11 22:59:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I would not say that it is right but hey who knows. The job of the army is impossible because if they hide behind civilians how do they tell who is the enemy this is part of the problem with finding the killers after an atrocity.
Kill the dictators and those with the family linked but they should have a trial either way and not just be subjected to a lynch mob.

2007-12-11 22:54:54 · answer #2 · answered by Edgein 7 · 0 0

Civilians death has always been part of war and always will be. It is impossible to lead a campaign without the risk to innocent life. Therefore if is not excepted and thought OK by the population war would not be possible.
The British army would always seek to minimise civilian casulaties but to say it should not be acceptable that they may die is nonsence.

2007-12-11 22:49:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Are these the same Brittons who despise terrorists for tageting civilians?

If we hate terrorists that target us, how can we justify targeting civilians abroad?

The arguement that they are just collateral damage and they the fighters hide amongst the civilians does not hold up as that is accidental, not targeting.

2007-12-11 22:18:46 · answer #4 · answered by Marky 6 · 3 0

Yes it's a huge leap,I for one think its a disgrace,civilians should never be targeted in this way,it is always the innocent who suffer please look at the links below .What have these people ever done to deserve this?

http://www.thefourreasons.org/victimsofwar.htm
http://www.care.org/newsroom/specialreports/victimsofwar/index.asp

ABSOLUTELY NOTHING

2007-12-12 06:20:26 · answer #5 · answered by ǝuoʎʞɔɐʍ 7 · 3 0

there is no doubt in my mind, that the targeting of civilians is not acceptable either, to members of the
But how does one identify say, a suicide bomber, or a terrorist in the theatre of war we are engaged in at the moment.?it would make things much easier if we could do that, any ideas would be most welcome.

2007-12-12 01:22:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

This half is made up of the scum the police sweep off the streets each night when the pubs close.

2007-12-11 23:46:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

FFS, it must have been the same 1000 people surveyed that they use for Family Fortunes! PMSL

Thats f*cked up by the way!

2007-12-12 00:16:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

human beings did declare Anne grew to become right into a witch or a minimum of that she'd tried to coach witchcraft. It grew to become into even claimed that she'd tried to poison human beings. in spite of the undeniable fact that, this grew to become into only expedient. The value grew to become into particularly adultery, and subsequently treason. Henry and his advisors went alongside with witchcraft claims by using fact they bolstered his case for removing Anne. the real reason he had to try this, as you factor out, grew to become into that he had to do away along with her, being ill of her, and circulate directly to a diverse lady he was hoping might provide him a healthful son. Given the problems he'd confronted marrying her interior the 1st place, getting out from below the marriage required all the ammunition he ought to muster. She grew to become into unpopular, so it is not amazing human beings thought she grew to become into some style of witch who'd bewitched the King. it somewhat is how human beings thought interior the sixteenth century. They believed in witches. As for the 6th finger, mutually as she possibly did no longer have an entire 6th finger, she does seem to have had some style of develop -- possibly a sprint rudimentary finger -- on one in all her palms. it is not sparkling precisely what it grew to become into.

2016-11-26 00:18:56 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

War is war and civilians will always be targeted.

2007-12-12 00:06:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers