Those who believe that there is no external purpose of life, i.e. from God, still must find some reason for living. Disregarding God, I would think that evolution must be the process by which we are forced to invent these reasons for living. Since evolution is a natural process and has no goal or purpose in mind, how do we logically select a reason for living that will satisfy this non-rational, evolution-provided demand? We can't argue or negotiate or even have an intelligent conversation with evolution.
So do we go through some list of things to do and try to pick out by feelings what we think will work? Save the whales? Save the snails? Save the ...
2007-12-11
21:45:32
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Matthew T
7
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
I chose the phrase, "reasons for living" which refers to internally derived purpose to distinguish it from externally derived purpose.
2007-12-11
21:50:02 ·
update #1
Angel: People constantly sit down and ask here on Y!A to get help to work out their reason for living. I think that is solid evidence that we do need a reason. "Life is to BE lived. Not rationalised" That is what animals do but humans can't help but to think about these things.
2007-12-11
22:07:10 ·
update #2
Pour la Paix: You've told me what you have chosen but not how you went about choosing what you did.
Persona: If we don't think about such things, then there is no problem. Again judging from the number of questions about purpose on Y!A, people are not able to prevent themselves from thinking.
2007-12-11
22:14:13 ·
update #3