Well, some one punches you in the eye over and over again (terrorist attacks on U.S. sites over seas), and all you do is moan and groan, it is no surprise they decided to punch you in the throat (9/11). The U.S. was doing nothing but the countries that allowed the terrorist to grow and prosper in their countries didn't expect the U.S. to do a dang thing since we hadn't in the past. Now that the U.S. is doing something we get the warmonger symbol. Well...too bad for them, there is only so much BS allowed.
2007-12-11 21:42:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
You may be right, President Bush may be the number one warmonger but, is that really so bad?
Non-Liberal states and entities are the enemy and pose a threat to western civilization. Western civilization is the most advanced humanity has ever been. It is not a bad thing to protect it from those who would destroy it. We are on the internet discussing this because of western civilization's achievements. The hope for the future lies with western civilization, now is not the time to lose it to the new barbarians.
In my opinion, President Bush isn't warmonger enough.
2007-12-11 22:28:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bush started a unnecessary and unjust war under international law and he is threatening to start another one. That makes him a warmonger. The US is still considered the No 1 military power in the world, so would make Bush the No 1 Warmonger of the world.
2007-12-11 21:41:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Q,
Well, your link lead to a website that proudly proclaims "Marxist Thoughts Online"...
I dunno...I think the article and the website that advocates it may be a bit skewed in their viewpoint.
SOME people also think that Stalin had nothing to do with all the folks he sent to the gulag and/or had killed.
So, to answer your question...Some folks are going to think whatever they will, whether the thought has any basis in fact or reality.
2007-12-11 21:29:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Wolfsburgh 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Bush is America's number one enemy. Yes, not Bin Laden Not Ahmad Najat (Iranian president).
See how people in America re living? and how many beggars in the subway in new york and how many homeless people all over the united states of America compare America during Clinton's era with Bush's era and you will realize that Bush came to destroy this great nation.
I am not American but i love America and i was in NY in the year 2000 and everything was perfect and i was in NY last month and i saw the difference!!
I am a Muslim and an Arab and i love America and i felt sorry for the poor Americans in the street with no place to go to!
Not all Muslims nor Arabs Hate America.
2007-12-11 21:28:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Confused_Distracted_Guy 2
·
2⤊
5⤋
Thats a no brainer! Its kinda embarrasing to see so many Bush supporters on here! HOW MANY LAWS DOES THAT MAN HAVE TO BREAK OR CHANGE FOR PEOPLE TO SEE WHAT IS GOING ON?
2007-12-11 22:02:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by stoner38 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
he was going to be a WAR PRESIDENT whether we liked it or not. And if the neocons are so christian why don't they just turn the other cheek like Jesus said to. Not Bush, Cheney...
2007-12-11 21:44:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
three words.
total
liberal
pap.
given the choice between defending this country or succumbing the pelosi/reid regimes ridiculous policy of unilateral surrender, ill stay with bush.
2007-12-11 21:33:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
I think those people who think that are idiots. (Mrs. Rissa, I keep checking out this website that you post all the time and it doesn't work!) I can't imagine that a Marxist website would think badly of Bush...ummm...I'm just sayin"
2007-12-11 21:27:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by elaine 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
I think he is protecting big business interests and in order to do that he must utilize our sons and daughters as prey - after all, they ARE expendable!
2007-12-11 21:51:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mary W 4
·
1⤊
2⤋