It seems like somehow they blamed Bush's 2003 attack of Iraq on the Democratic Congress that took charge 4 years later in 2007
This would be a stretch even for Doctor Who.
2007-12-11 16:29:18 · 14 answers · asked by Guerilla Liberal fighter 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
no the seeds of 9/11 were planted by the Carter administration there was nothing Reagan could do.
2007-12-11 18:03:08 · answer #1 · answered by gherd 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The fact is that many of the dems in congress that are now putting the prez down for Iraq, were there supporting Iraq in 2003 or whenever it was. Its not like congress changes completely every four years.
2007-12-11 16:44:40 · answer #2 · answered by Disciple of Truth 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
This is a bogus question inasmuch as the democrats own defeat. No one has blamed it on democrats. Let's face any action to protect America would never be started by the defeatocrats.
2007-12-11 16:44:35 · answer #3 · answered by Brandon A 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
And now, what have we got?
Our illustrious Congress has enjoyed the lowest popularity ratings of any branch of government ever measured.
Our illustrious Congress right now is doing nothing. No bills, no appropriations, nothing.
Conservatives predicted that if democrats took over, we'd have at least 2 years of investigations into our own government. Not only were they right, the investigations have resulted in absolutely nothing!
Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are redefining incompetence.
2007-12-11 16:35:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Every body belived iraq had wmd bill oh so powerfully annoying hillary and many more democrats incl congress men they all though we should go to iraq then when it turned out bad they backed out blamed bush and then prended they nvr backed him up there is a good reason that we whent to war with iraq
2007-12-11 16:38:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
No one blames the Democrats. However, when Hillary Clinton and all of the other presidential candidates come out and say "we shouldn't be in Iraq", etc... They should he held accountable if they voted FOR the war in Iraq.
2007-12-11 16:33:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
I'm sorry, but your questions lack intelligence or a hint that you have true knowledge of which you speak. Even Hillary voted for the war in Iraq you ditz. Hind sight is 2020, so it's easy to say now that we shouldn't have! THAT'S WHAT HILLARY'S DOING!
2007-12-11 16:46:38 · answer #7 · answered by Eyeswideopen 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
There is no need to blame. It is the hypocrite democrats that now act like they were always against it that are ridiculed.
2007-12-11 16:33:32 · answer #8 · answered by bravozulu 7 · 7⤊ 2⤋
Kind of like how they blame 9/11 on Clinton, even though Bush was in office for a year.
2007-12-11 16:40:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 6⤋
No, no...you are using the wrong terminology
It's Liberation of Iraq, not "attack of Iraq"
words mean things, please choose them more carefully
2007-12-11 16:52:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋