so the United Nations have been critized for not been able to do their job...what have they failed at doing?

Question

and why are they incapable of doing it? The United Nations does not have an army of their own right?

Answer 1

The real question is what is the point of the United Nations. If it is peace through diplomacy, they have failed miserably. It it is ending hunger, they have failed miserably. If it is relieving world suffering, it has failed miserably.

Answer 2

When have they failed? Sierra Leone, most of Bosnia, Somalia, currently Darfur, and the biggie is Rwanda. The main criticism is that all they do is talk and dont really accomplish anything. But, we do have to keep in mind that it is a very berueacratic and democratic organization, so it takes time to accomplish things, basically because the organization is just so huge. Yes, their views and opinions may not be the same as the United States, but that is the whole point of the organization. People often complain about how much the UN fails but do not take into consideration the progress that it has done. It has all but stopped Polio, is helping millions to fight HIV, and has helped with development in many poor countries. To the people who hate the UN: how would you solve these problems any better?

Answer 3

between the subject concerns that crippled the legitimacy and well worth of the League of international locations grew to become into their lack of ability to fully use rigidity or maybe comfortable power to set off others to do something- and, lots of the international locations that ended up disrupting the international order (Germany, Russia) ultimately left the league, and subsequently weren't undertaking to their regulations. the shortcoming of inclusion of the U. S. somewhat did no longer help strengthen the team, however the team had no genuine coherent imaginitive and prescient or plan. The UN, on the different hand, grew to become into shaped as a team of international locations who have been allies against the Axis Powers, and so had some consumer-friendly objectives- an end to militarism, the corporate and risk-free practices of human rights, and the main appropriate of international locations to control themselves. With a creed that greater effective than only Western Europeans ought to accept as true with, further and extra international places started transforming into a member of- so via the very nature of its club, it grew better and greater valid. And the international places that did no longer prefer to "play ball" and have been maximum possibly to interrupt aside the UN, the Soviet Union and linked Warsaw %. international places and China, commonly additionally performed via the UN's regulations of their tries to defy them. And, appropriate of serious on the subject of the UN, no significant power ever left after it joined.

Answer 4

The genocide in Dar far, every time the nations wanted to punish Sudan, China would threaten to veto as they value the oil. It was only after the media was going to protest next years Olympics that they allowed a vote. They where going to be called the genocide Olympics. Rwanda was another example, everyone knew it was happening but did nothing.

Answer 5

"not been able to do their job" means its not doing what America wants it to do. The earth is America's. Don't you know that by now?

Answer 6

The US is the UN

Without us the UN is even more meaningless than it is now

Answer 7

certainly not cashing there pay checks taking bribes

Answer 8

God! When the HELL are we going to get out of the "U.N.?"