English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

By Studying genetic traits, do scientists in turn study the inheritance of human traits? Why or Why not? 10 points to right answer. or best. =)

2007-12-11 12:45:03 · 5 answers · asked by ~!Ashley!~ 3 in Science & Mathematics Biology

Or the only person that answers... lol.

2007-12-11 12:49:54 · update #1

5 answers

Yes scientists study the inheritance of human traits. They want to be able to determine how genetic material is inherited and what exactly is inherited. They must study genetic traits to test how they are passed on and why a certain trait is passed on or if it is not.

2007-12-11 12:54:18 · answer #1 · answered by Lauren 3 · 0 0

Of course scientists study the inheritance of genetic traits. That's what punnett squares, gene maps, and pedigrees are for. Studying inheritance reveals a lot about genetic traits and therefore human traits. When scientists find out about genetic traits (genotypes) it tells them about the physical traits, (phenotypes.) Hope this helps...the question was kinda vague.

2007-12-11 12:57:47 · answer #2 · answered by Copenne 2 · 0 0

the reason it is actual is that the information often is the same, even with our surroundings, however our surroundings performs a needed function in producing any result that information has. An analogy could be taking an english observe and conversing that observe interior the U.S. vs conversing it on an alien planet. the information represented with the help of the spoken observe could be same in the two circumstances however the a number of contexts wherein the information exists heavily replace the end result it has. Yelling "fire" interior the U.S. could bring about a crowd of inquisitive people to variety, while yelling "fire" on Mars would not. Genes are information. whilst a gene is expressed (on any point; be it molecular, cellular, organismal, and so forth.) there are various things interior our surroundings of the gene which will dictate precisely how that information would be transduced. If the gene have been in a human cellular - it would desire to offer a protein; if it have been in basic terms some DNA in a try tube, it would not. If the gene have been in an insect - it may reason antennae to enhance the place the legs could be; the same gene in a fish could make its scales pink (ok, those are only stupid examples, yet you get the element...) the main important to understand-how this, is that genetic information isn't something extra advantageous than that - information. information on my own does no longer something and is exceedingly ineffective except you think approximately the CONTEXT wherein that information is being created, destroyed, altered, and so forth.

2016-12-10 20:16:26 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes, I think these two studies go together. When scientists study traits and look at their presence or absence in several generations, they learn about how those traits are inherited.

2007-12-11 12:52:59 · answer #4 · answered by ecolink 7 · 0 0

no

2007-12-11 12:53:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers