English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

Absolutely Vick
jd

2007-12-13 12:27:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What Vick did. Even though during an abortion you are still taking a life it is still fairly quick and painless. He tourtured those dogs and they died slow horrible deaths and he should be shown the same treatment he showed them dogs. He wouldn't like it if some one beat the s*** out of him or drowned him everytime he love an F****ing football game would he!?! He's sick!

2007-12-11 20:22:29 · answer #2 · answered by dawggurl47 3 · 1 0

I can't stand when people take two horrible things that are absolutely unrelated and try to compare them. It's pointless. No two "wrongs" make a "right". Just b/c one person is passionate about a particular issue doesn't mean they condone a different hot-button issue.

Our legal system says it's legal to get an abortion regarless of what you or I think about it.

Our legal system says it's illegal to fight dogs, abuse, them, kill them, and commit fraud.

2007-12-11 20:14:43 · answer #3 · answered by ifixrex2000 2 · 1 0

I think both are fine by me i cant tell a woman what to do with her womb and i don't believe killing dogs should put you in jail for 2 years.

2007-12-11 19:58:18 · answer #4 · answered by NY GIANTS SUPERBOWL CHAMPS 2 · 0 0

michael vick, women do that by accident or desperation, he did it for recreation sport and money, the greedy f---er

2007-12-12 15:52:39 · answer #5 · answered by kakylale 3 · 0 0

Michael Vick.
the dogs were alive, the embryos were not yet born.

2007-12-11 22:00:36 · answer #6 · answered by madcow 3 · 0 0

in my opinion, Vick. those poor dogs led whole lives of torment and cruelty

2007-12-11 20:23:58 · answer #7 · answered by ❤fabulousSARA❤ 4 · 0 0

vick is way worse

2007-12-11 20:43:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers