Are the those who desire the truth behind 9/11, getting burnt out with those who ignorantly oppose them?

Question

While you can look at popular mechanics, the history Chanel or loose change and other conspiratorially ideas. What you cannot do with any true accuracy, is to say that you know what really happened that day. While we may never know all the details, it is a fact that there was a cover up of some sort and an investigation was suppressed. The motives were obviously had to do with national security.
The big question is how far is to far and dose the end always justify the means?

"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which can not fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance-that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
--HERBERT SPENCER

9/11 Omission Commission
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDiLeTEN4LE&search=conspiracy

9/11 Truth; 9/11 Commission Purposly Whitewashed 9/11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSuQUvbl8Hc&mode=related&search=conspiracy

Is this the best you can come up with? Try addressing the questions proposed rather then related issues that may or may not be held by the questioner. What dose u tube have to do with the price of beans and what dose since have to do with the inconsistencies in the reports given to us on the accounts of that day. In fact what dose since have to do with any of the question I have about 9/11?
I can't figure out what people are even talking about when they make erroneous assumptions.
I was going to post another u tube video of some of the 9/11 commission hearings, but I suppose people will just contemptuously right it off as unreliable.

Why did I say "ignorantly oppose"? Because very few people who rebut those who ask questions have limited knowledge of the questions that are actually being asked. So instead them charter off about things that are not even brought up. I really am not interested in misinformation, but thanks anyway.

Answer 1

Those are excellent videos, and it boggles the mind that anyone can look at any video asking those and other similar questions, and fail to see the inconsistencies in the official story. Our questions are totally legitimate, and if they had nothing to hide, they would answer them to our satisfaction, along with video that clearly supports their story, like video that CLEARLY shows that really big plane disappearing into that tiny 16ft hole, for example. *sm*

Answer 2

I agree that no one will ever know what truly happened. I mean, sure scientists can take a look and prove the collapse and what not, but can they also tell us what the hijackers were thinking? Can they tell us who really sent them and what their entire plan is? The entire war in Iraq is supposedly based on 'theory.'

I'm not going to pretend that I know what I'm talking about, because I don't. I didn't follow the 9/11 thing, but I do know that no one except the men who brought down the planes can ever really tell us what happened.

Ok, onyx1, what the hell are you talking about? The question was about 9/11, not nurses and grammar.

Answer 3

sure, the hatred for united statesa. is going decrease back to the seashores of Tripoli in the process the Barbary Wars. even though it is going even decrease back farther to our ecu roots and the Crusades. no person merits to die because of the fact the sufferers of 9/11 yet in each and every existence there ought to fall rain, and whilst this rain is composed of us, that's a deluge. Our u . s . a . exchange into birthed in conflict and suckled on the teat in 1812/1814. We have been little ones into the Civil conflict and there we grew to become little ones. interior the Spanish-American conflict and WWI we became little ones, packed with spunk and able to run. Then got here WWII and we grew to become adults being pressured to combat a conflict on 2 fronts. sure we had lots of help and if no longer for that help we and Europe might have lost. for the duration of that conflict the Muslims regularly sided with our enemy, the Germans. This further to their hatred individuals. the yank concept seems to be that anybody ought to have a central authority like ours, they must think of like us and ought to no longer step over the line interior the sand. because of the fact of this we've enemies. we can not permit dozing canines lie and ought to maintain poking them with our pointed sticks until they commence growling and nipping at us. i've got faith that if we would have popular them as they're decrease back years in the past, we does no longer be having this plenty hassle from them. the two that or annihilated them as quickly as and for all.

Answer 4

Some claim the 9/11 commission was a whitewash, I agree.

Answer 5

Conspiratous hog wash! Who was behind the 9-11 attacks? A bunch of pissed off Arabs. If the conspiracy was true, and the government was behind it, then why are the people who made those videos still alive? If the government is capable of killing 3000 of its own citizens, why not 3 or 4 more? The answer is that these videos are ridiculous, and only someone with sever mental retardation would believe these rantings and half-witted rumors as fact. Get a life.

Answer 6

9/11 was in inside job!!!

The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie The cake is a lie

Seriously, come on... You are insulting the people who died that day.

Answer 7

Why do you consider people who do not agree with you as ignorant?

Is science so hard to believe? All of the conspiracy theories have been rebutted, just like those about the JFK assassination.

YouTube is not proof and hardly as credible as Popular Mechanics. Anybody can put stuff on YouTube, just look at the "Leave Britney Alone!" video.

Answer 8

It's amazing how people totally lose their ability to use their own common sense.

Answer 9

I don't agree, and you need to take that nurses uniforn off, because you are no nurse, your poor grammar and misspelled words prove it. A nurse has to be able to spell to translate doctors orders, take notes, keep records,etc. There was one nurse on here with that same avitar and I think you cloned her, you sound like a 15 or 16 year old.

Answer 10

I would have to disagree that you can't know what really happened that day.

We have thousands of scientists who have completely explained the collapse.

You can't find single, solitary, lone engineer who has published an article, in a real journal, in favor of the conspiracy theory.

This is a powerful fact that effectively puts an end to the conspiracy tales.

For example:

-- The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057

-- Massachusetts Institute of Technology. See http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/

--NIST (National Institute on Science and Technology):
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
Also see the lead investigator of NIST explain the collapse at
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/
Click on "Impact to Collapse"

-- The leading demolition journal in the world is against the conspiracy theorists:
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

-- Purdue (http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html

--Professor Bazant (Northwestern Dept of Civil Engineering) is one of only 14 people to win the Prager Award in engineering. He first described the collapse mechanism as follows: http://www.debunking911.com/ProgressiveCollapseWTC-6-23-2006.pdf

--FEMA along with American Society of Civil Engineers, did an extensive analysis of the WTC collapse (ASCE/FEMA World Trade Center Building Performance Study (BPS) Team)
http://www.fema.gov/rebuild/mat/mat_fema403.shtm
It’s useful to see the investigation team & their credentials at: http://www.asce.org/responds/wtc_team.cfm

-- Popular Mechanics published a huge article citing 300 renowned experts in demolition & engineering.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

-- Columbia University has permanent seismographic recorders that was running on 9/11 which clearly show no explosives during the collapse of Towers 1 & 2, or of WTC7 . See page 2 of
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

--The “American Society of Civil Engineers” & the “Structural Engineering Institute” (both are non-governmental) investigated the Pentagon crash. Their report is called "The Pentagon Performance Report" & it’s at:
http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

-- Scientific American. See
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000DA0E2-1E15-128A-9E1583414B7F0000
====================
Some other points:

The jet at the Pentagon did not "disappear into a 16 foot" hole.

The plane made a 90 foot hole, which is huge, as determined by the American Society of Civil Engineers.

See page 23 (section 6.1) of
http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

This is just one example of the incredible lies that are spouted by the internet films. This one example is what many would call "a badge of fraud." It's a huge warning sign to anyone who wants the truth.

Stick to the experts. You'll get the truth.

The 90 foot hole is slightly smaller than the diameter of the jet, but you'd expect this given the outer shell of the plane is aluminum & the Pentagon was blast-hardened reinforced concrete.