http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/118A369D-A5BF-4F65-8F3B-01665CDD1F31.htm
Iran's president has said that there is no legal basis for more sanctions against Tehran after a US intelligence report concluded that it stopped trying to build a nuclear bomb four years ago.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's comments on Tuesday came as the US, Russia, China, France, Britain and Germany met to discuss a new UN resolution punishing Iran.
"We think that any such measure has lost its legal basis," Ahmadinejad said.
"We had two rounds of sanctions and what happened? Nothing," he said in a two-hour news conference. "Now is the time for them to change their behaviour."
should there be more sanctions on Iran, if so Why???
2007-12-11 09:09:30 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
No. If they've found that they've stopped the nuke programme then where the hell is the justification? This is gonna turn out to be iraq all over again. An imagined enemy is a powerful tool to control society...and it seems America is using it effectively. What twats.
2007-12-11 09:22:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Iran has the flexibility to end sanctions being imposed by working an open nuclear skill facility. no person is attempting to stay faraway from them having nuclear skill, if certainty, fairly some worldwide places have provided to help. Iran by continuing to pursue this direction is leaving the UN with out strategies distinctive than sanctions. sure the persons will pass with the aid of situation regardless of if it would be now no longer something in assessment to the situation that should be brought about around the middle East in the event that they have been allowed to proceed.
2016-10-11 02:09:36 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No more sanctions, not the right approach as it doesn't help solve the problems. Who knows, the reformists might regain power so it's not wise to make Iran the pariah, the only problem then is the Supreme Leader, and that is a problem fot the Iranians to sort out. I have doubts that Ahmadinejad will remain popular.
2007-12-11 09:24:35 · answer #3 · answered by Ern T 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Mahmoud is the man who denies the holocaust yet wants to remove Israel from the page of time. I don't see him speaking in good faith. Perhaps his conscience is clear because of the doctrine of taqiya.
And he does support terrorists (not freedom fighters) in Iraq.
I don't trust his words or his intentions.
2007-12-11 17:34:40 · answer #4 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Its time for a few strategically placed bunker busters. Its just time to give the "rat" some rat poison.
2007-12-11 09:31:03 · answer #5 · answered by mik4759 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
well he would wouldn't he.....?
he should take his own advice and change his behaviour - he could start by stopping the funding and encouragement of terrorist organisations
he could start by stopping promoting hatred and threatening genocide of another people in the middle east
2007-12-11 10:56:12 · answer #6 · answered by Tequila.... 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
im assuming your British and therefore European what does Iran have to do with any one else but Iranians sanctions on an all ready sanctioned country do nothing but harm the ordinary peaceful person
2007-12-11 09:28:01 · answer #7 · answered by ISAIAH 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I agree with Ricardo
2007-12-11 10:34:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
We all know Iran is incredibly pure and holy so why should they want to trade with the infidels in the West
2007-12-11 09:24:08 · answer #9 · answered by RAH RAH 7 · 4⤊ 5⤋
we'll wait and see.
2007-12-11 14:13:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋