What do you think of this interesting scenario?
2007-12-11 07:28:02 · 15 answers · asked by Mariner 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
If it's cold, that's global warming. If it's warm, that's global warming. If it's dry, that's global warming. If it's wet, that's global warming. If there's a tornado, that's global warming. If there is no tornado, that's caused by global warming as well?! Forget about those refugees in Sudan, peace is all about making people feel bad about their SUVs.
2007-12-11 07:38:19 · answer #1 · answered by michinoku2001 7 · 3⤊ 9⤋
Do you want to wait till there is NO ICE LEFT in the midwest before you understand that small changes in the temperate zone go unnoticed - but create huge melt problems in the arctic that change the air currents and bring drought to the midwest and south?
""2007 shattered records for Arctic melt in the following ways:
• 552 billion tons of ice melted this summer from the Greenland ice sheet, according to preliminary satellite data to be released by NASA Wednesday. That's 15 percent more than the annual average summer melt, beating 2005's record.""
2007-12-11 16:01:25 · answer #2 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
What I think is that it is painfully clear that the people who are stupidly, ignorantly, embarrassingly commenting on "ice storms" etc. are woefully unaware what environmental disaster we are facing.
Here's a hint: It doesn't happen overnight.
Here's another hint: Asheville, Charlotte, and Raleigh are all experiencing RECORD-BREAKING HIGH TEMPERATURES for this time of year.
The warming of the oceans have completely altered weather patterns, fool. As in the Earth is 75% covered with water? As in water holds heat? As in warmer oceans emit heat and lead to warmer air currents? As in weather = warm air meeting cooler air? It's very complicated, so don't worry your pretty little head about it. Just continue guzzling energy and living in the dark. You will anyway.
2007-12-11 15:47:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 1⤋
I think that the Nobel Peace Prize has nothing to do with global warming. The Nobel peace prize is an award that is given out by liberals to other liberals such as Carter and Gore. Hillary will probably get the next one.
2007-12-11 15:46:01 · answer #4 · answered by Bernie R 5 · 4⤊ 5⤋
And much of the Southeastern U.S. is having record high temperatures. So what?
2007-12-11 15:45:58 · answer #5 · answered by Brian A 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
One thing has nothing to do with another. Read about ice melts if you want to get an accurate picture of what's going on and what the danger is.
2007-12-11 15:35:52 · answer #6 · answered by Stephen L 6 · 11⤊ 3⤋
lol if you had the capacity to use the brain you were born with you would be dangerous boy.
2007-12-11 16:32:40 · answer #7 · answered by Open your eyes 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
This comes from a lack of unbiased and objective studies. When you are already convinced of global warming and then do a study on it, you results tend to come out to be what you want them to be.
I guess he is still upset over the election and needs something to do, like maybe starting an excercise program. Why doesnt he take up the health of Americans as a cause.
What say you?
2007-12-11 15:39:58 · answer #8 · answered by Michael K 1 · 2⤊ 10⤋
I found that juxtaposition of events on the news last night quite amusing myself.
It's still quite beyond me how one wins a Nobel peace prize for hosting a film about global warming.
2007-12-11 15:35:39 · answer #9 · answered by Sean 7 · 3⤊ 10⤋
I think it reinforces the NEW liberal slant of calling it "global climate change" that way they can blame ANY weather on "global warming".
All in the name of putting money in Al Gore's pocket via his carbon offset company.
2007-12-11 15:38:09 · answer #10 · answered by Ricky T 6 · 3⤊ 9⤋