2007-12-11 06:56:10 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
note - im not whining, its a question but thanks for trying
2007-12-11 07:04:32 · update #1
that's what I said.
Since they are #1 and probably will finish the best team, they already aren't being punished but not that they still get that trade they are practically being rewarded. the NFL sucks *** and the commisoner needs to be beaten.
NFL is going down hill, and even Patriots* fans have to know that isn't fair, but then again they don't really know right from wrong so maybe they don't
2007-12-11 07:11:37 · answer #1 · answered by me 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because he knew it would be to much. Look, you can film the Defensive coordinator or anyone you want from the booth with no penalty. Having the Camera on the sidelines is against the rules. A few years ago players use to video each other and games on the sidelines so the NFL made rules against it. They punished the Patriot's and Belichick because they wanted all teams to stop the practice.
You do realize that Mangini did it himself in 2006 against the Patriot's and commissioned someone to do it for the Patriot's in 2005.
If you don't like the Pat's or you are ashamed of what your team is compared to the Patriot's. Don't take it out on what could be the best team in history. IE: Single Season QB touchdown record, Single Season WR touchdown record, Most point's scored in a single season, largest point differential in a single season by a team, and possibly an un-defeated season!
Anything else you would want your team to achive? maybe 3 SuperBowls in 6 years? . . . . . . . .Oh the Patriot's have done that too.
2007-12-11 07:31:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
because taking one first round pick was already stiffest punishment in nfl history.
do you think videotaping another teams coordinators from the field instead of from another part of the stadium where its legal is a serious enough violation to warrant losing two first round picks? if so, if another team does it someday and they dont have two first round picks, would they have to give up one that year, and one the following year?
personally i think one first round pick was a pretty harsh punishment. and if it was a team not doing as well as the pats it would have been less severe
2007-12-11 07:00:34 · answer #3 · answered by negaduck 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Uh...Because that draft pick was obtained in a trade before the camera crap...In other words, they couldn't take it away...
2007-12-11 07:03:24 · answer #4 · answered by Terry C. 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Actually I think he should have taken the HIGHEST first round draft pick they had.
2007-12-11 07:01:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The NFL league office wanted to be certain to give people like you something to whine about..........thats why...
2007-12-11 07:02:56 · answer #6 · answered by gotttalovittt 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
he forgot!! lol
2007-12-11 07:00:40 · answer #7 · answered by youmustfoldaces 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋