1. The First Crusade played a very important part in Medieval England. The First Crusade was an attempt to re-capture Jerusalem. After the capture of Jerusalem by the Muslims in 1076, any Christian who wanted to pay a pilgrimage to the city faced a very hard time. Muslim soldiers made life very difficult for the Christians and trying to get to Jerusalem was filled with danger for a Christian. This greatly angered all Christians.
2.Crusade that followed Saladin's re-conquest of much of Palestine in 1187, which included the lose of Jerusalem. The Third Crusade was led by Frederick I Barbarossa of Germany, Philip II Augustus of France and Richard I the Lionheart of England, the three greatest monarchs of Western Europe at the time, all of whom were experienced military leaders, although Philip and Richard were already at odds before the crusade began.
3.No one has ever doubted that Doge Enrico Dandolo, the 39th Doge of Venice, was clever. His audacious appropriation of the forces of the Fourth Crusade to serve the ambitions of Venice is irrefutable evidence that he was a master of intrigue. The only question is whether he planned the events of 1201-1204 from the beginning or merely reacted brilliantly to opportunities as they unfolded.
4.One day in May 1212 there appeared at Saint-Denis, where King Philip of France was holding his court, a shepherd-boy of about twelve years old called Stephen, from the small town of Cloyes in the Orléannais.
2007-12-11 06:13:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, but so can the text books you are obviously trying to avoid reading.
Read the appropriate sections, or do research at the library, or with Google (etc), take notes, and re-write it from your understanding. This is called learning. Having someone else do it for you is called plagerism.
Incidentally...more and more institutions are running text comparisons between submitted papers and any source that can be found on the web. If you do quote a source exactly, make sure you attribute the source correctly. If you don't and get caught...you'll fail the course.
Below, you will find a link to a Google search on the word "Crusades."
2007-12-11 06:15:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by jcurrieii 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
There was no accomplishment of the Childrens Crusade.
The few children that survived the march were sold into slavery and/or murdered for not converting to Islam.
2007-12-11 06:12:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by sahel578 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
i'm not able to think of of 5 significant accomplishments ANY of the three applicants have finished... rather i'm not able to think of of one any of them have finished? needless to say... their supporters probable have issues that they think of are "significant"... yet once you relatively seem at them... they are not... I mean i ought to record some expenditures he's co-subsidized that i assumed have been stable... yet ordinary they weren't "significant"... very reminiscent of the accomplishment of the different applicants.. Bush actual did not have any the two in 2000... and relatively nevertheless does not.... please record some in case you realize any... i'm drawing blanks all the way around...
2016-12-31 06:54:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
without those crusade's we would all be Islamic religion and the women would have a very scary life.
It held them back, until they could get oceans away from them.
2007-12-11 06:11:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋