Why or why not?
2007-12-11 06:02:28 · 6 answers · asked by Samar A 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Mythology & Folklore
Actually, in the original story, the monster WAS NOT UGLY!
2007-12-11 07:06:22 · answer #1 · answered by germaine_87313 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in the novel "frankenstein" i think that victor made the right decision when he decided to stop making the creature's companion. he ultimately had two choices: ONE - he could make another monster (a female), the monsters create baby monsters, and a whole new species of terrifying creatures are born. TWO - he choses not to create another monster, but runs the risk of his angry and lonely creature killing the rest of his family and friends. (after he destroys his creature's companion, elizabeth is killed). so victor made a very unselfish decision not to follow through with his promise to the monster. i think this is what i would have done for the same reason... to save humanity!
2007-12-11 06:17:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Big Frank seemed kinda unhappy. I think he needed a friend. I woulda made him a little ankle biter sized dog, maybe a weiner dog or a beagle. The dog would have a flat top, because it adds character when the pet looks like it's owner. He could pet it (I'd make sure the head was on real tight so it didn't fall off), and take it for walks in the park. He could even cuddle in with it when there was a scary lightning storm. Poochinstein would make him happier and everything would be better.
2007-12-11 07:53:33 · answer #3 · answered by Wise Frog 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I would feel bad knowing that I had created a monster and I would try to destroy it.
2007-12-11 06:11:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No! there are enough ugly people in this world!
2007-12-11 06:10:10 · answer #5 · answered by Sophie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ONLY if both of them would be completely obedient to me.
2007-12-11 21:08:01 · answer #6 · answered by kveldulf_gondlir 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋