Why from time infinite and the creation of humans is it that humans are unable to coexist in harmony betwen sexes, classes , and races from the time of the Creator Adam, Lillith and Eve. We have yet to attain perfect peace, eternal youth, and health. man strives today, works, fights, hates, kills, craves, envies and suffers.
2007-12-11
05:32:14
·
18 answers
·
asked by
VAndors Excelsior™ (Jeeti Johal Bhuller)™
7
in
Social Science
➔ Anthropology
Do you not think that under if not non achievment since humanity was created is a huge failure on our part. That there is a glaring truth that would free us from disease, ageing, intolerance and war, until we become self sufficient, self thinking, self disciplined, self willed. Free thinking, free willed, self healing, self arousing, self driven. A complete mastery of the self, mind body and soul..?
2007-12-13
06:17:29 ·
update #1
I believe you are mixing biological evolution (a cutthroat, fighting and killing enterprise about survival of the fittest) with cultural evolution (primarily a human phenomenon). Human history has usually been a story of dominating each other, striving for power rather than peace. The peaceful monks that are raided and slaughtered leave only their legend behind. One day we may destroy ourselves or the environment enough to either wipe the slate clean or wake up and realize all of this must change.
Besides, would you really want eternal youth? I think part of the problem is that there are too many people already, if we had eternal youth we'd have to find a way to control the population into a number much lower than it is now.
2007-12-11 07:29:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
human beings are descended from monkeys, genuine, yet an extinct monkey, no longer any extant species (or maybe genus) of monkey. Evolution does not have a objective; each species alive at a given time is the two "developed" (or, in case you seem at it a distinctive way, those that have long previous via the main generations are the main developed, so micro organism are hundreds of thousands of cases as developed as human beings...). the clarification no longer each ancestral species is going extinct is that, properly, there is no reason they unavoidably ought to circulate extinct. One inhabitants gets chop up via, as an occasion, a organic catastrophe. Many generations later, one in all of the two populations remains residing by way of fact the ancestral inhabitants did, mutually as the different has been concern to very distinctive environmental forces. consequently, there is stabilizing determination, which keeps the only inhabitants from deviating too a approaches from the ancestral inhabitants. meanwhile the different inhabitants has experienced pressures that get rid of many genotypes, and permit others to thrive, best to internet differences to that inhabitants. seem, you needless to say don't comprehend evolution in any respect, and asking a pair questions right here won't somewhat help you that lots. study some books on the concern. you may initiate with "What evolution is", via Ernst Mayr.
2016-11-02 22:00:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by serpa 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are confusing biology and sociology. Evolution by natural selection occurs when genes that enhance reproduction are selected for. Perhaps the genes that lead to such behaviors in humans have some root in enhanced reproduction. This is an oversimplified answer for a complex question. However, you don't ask the correct question.
2007-12-11 05:43:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by aml0017 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Human beings are most certainly evolving. Today, there are more human beings alive than ever before in our species evolutionary history, and we are moving around the planet more than ever. Gene flow is in full flux.
There is no such biological concept as 'devolving' or 'de-evolution'. Also, there is one race, the human race. All variation in modern humans is clinal and extremely minor.
Cultural diversity has limited, and promoted gene flow and genetic drift in the last ten thousand years. Mutation and adaptive radiation also play a role in evolution.
2007-12-11 13:38:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by James Zaworski 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
You know I would love to answer this...but I am not sure who Lillith is??? I would say still evolving though, if I were to venture a guess. We would have to be. With the changes in the environment, varieties of foods and food additives, corrective surgeries and medicine I think it will eventually make an impact on the future of man/woman.
2007-12-11 05:36:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Moo Moo Mair 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
We are evolving, species dont evolve every year, it takes millions of years, but to prove it. In medieval times people where a lot smaller than now.
And i think with climate change coming fast, were gonna get some real evolutional changes. So if in 50 years your grandchild is born with 10 eyes. Then we know :P
2007-12-11 05:41:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by exkillonator 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
there are so many things which are still beyond the grasp of our understanding. what percentage of our brains do we use nowadays? even the concept of time is limited and limiting. i believe we are standing on a threshold. behind us: totally instinctive behaviour and beyond: (bear with me because my brain is only working at 10% of it's full ability, so it's hard to describe what i hope is to come) behaviour which is born of a harmonious coexistence between instinct and very sophisticated reasoning powers. thousands of years, millions of years, may turn out to be nothing more than a very tiny dot on the time-space continuum.
2007-12-12 06:08:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by fractal 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Man strives today, works, fights, hates, kills, craves, envies and suffers because man is a predatory organisms and that's what predatory organisms been doing for billions of years.
2007-12-12 13:30:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The idea of harmony of humans is ridiculous. Why would you bring a scientific idea like evolution into such mythology?
Anyways, without struggle, man would be bereft of honor, courage, heroism, passion, and comraderie. Such an existance would be a sad one.
2007-12-11 06:12:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by High Tide 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
We are evolving,,consider the Apendix a now defunct organ,the fact that modern man has wider shoulders than we did 100 years ago,,etc etc
2007-12-11 05:36:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋