This test only has one question, but it's a very important one. By giving an honest answer, you will discover where you stand morally. The test features an unlikely, completely fictional situation in which you will have to make a decision. Remember that your answer needs to be honest, yet spontaneous. Please scroll down slowly and give due consideration to each line.
You are in Florida, Miami to be specific. There is chaos all around you caused by a hurricane with severe flooding. This is a flood of biblical proportions. You are a photojournalist working for a major newspaper, and you're caught in the middle of this epic disaster. The situation is nearly hopeless. You're trying to shoot career-making photos. There are houses and people swirling around you, some disappearing under the
water. Nature is unleashing all of its destructive fury.
Suddenly you see a man floundering in the water. He is fighting for his life, trying not to be taken down with the debris. You move closer... somehow the man looks familiar. You suddenly realize who it is. It's George W. Bush! At the same time you notice that the raging waters are about to pull him under.
You have two options-you can save the life of G.W. Bush or you can shoot a dramatic Pulitzer Prize winning photo, documenting the death of one of the world's most powerful men.
So here's the question, and please give an honest answer :
Would you select high contrast color film, or would you go with the classic simplicity of black and white?
2007-12-11 01:50:01 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Senior Citizens
I wouldn't use any film, but I would scream loud enough for everyone around me to hear: Dammit, I forgot the damn film!!!
Must be my lucky day!!!!!
2007-12-11 02:19:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
I really don't like the guy, but I would do what is best for the both of us. I would save the President while taking shots while doing so. I can see the headline news: Agnostic Photographer saves the world's most powerful man while performing civial duties towards her job and career.
The next day: President Bush takes his life after realizing his life has been saved by a non-believer.
Then I'll be the last person documented shaking Bush's hands too.
Everyone will win.
2007-12-11 11:20:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Black and White
2007-12-11 10:58:04 · answer #3 · answered by Southern Comfort 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
High color of course. In reality, I have been in disaster services with American Red Cross since August 1992, so naturally, I would save anyone who needs to be rescued.
2007-12-11 10:22:13 · answer #4 · answered by slk29406 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that the classic simplicity of the black and white would do the most justice to the situation.
Good one Fisherman !! LOL
2007-12-11 17:17:48 · answer #5 · answered by bassetfreak 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither, I would have already evacuated to Seattle Wa. Risk My life for a picture of HIM in black or white, ya gotta be kiddin. My life is worth much more than THAT. LOL
2007-12-11 11:05:10 · answer #6 · answered by Star doodle 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You asked the question, not what I would really do tho. Not that I really like the man, but he is a human being.
I would say black and white. would say it all. A little darker, more somber.
2007-12-11 17:26:05 · answer #7 · answered by Moe 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, I would use neither. If it were a flood of epic proportions, I would be more interested in saving my fellow man, career be darned!
2007-12-11 10:12:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Classic film is the ONLY way to capture a classic joke -- yuk yuk
2007-12-11 12:28:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I guess I would have my digital with me so it would be bright color,,, but then I have the software program that I could use all different colors.. hehe
2007-12-12 02:47:30 · answer #10 · answered by ncgirl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋