The Philosophy of Inclusion: Roadblocks and Remedies for the Teacher and the Teacher Educator
Connie Titone. The Journal of Educational Thought. Calgary: Spring 2005. Vol. 39, Iss. 1; p. 7 (26 pages)
Abstract (Summary)
This article reports the conclusions of a study that examined the knowledge teachers need for successful implementation of inclusion in K-12 schools. Focus groups comprised of individuals experienced with inclusion were convened to discuss what prospective teachers need to know or be able to do to be successful in inclusive settings. The data highlight the importance of adequate teacher preparation, effective communication, and collaboration skills among educational professionals and parents. The recommendations that emerge from the study provide suggestions for enhancing adaptations to curriculum and pedagogy, as well as changes in courses and field experiences in preservice teacher education. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Ham or eggs? Teacher commitment to inclusion
by Updike, Mary-Ann, M.Ed., University of Manitoba (Canada), 2005, 139 pages; AAT MR05366
Abstract (Summary)
It has been said that the difference between involvement and commitment is like a ham and egg breakfast---the chicken was involved but the pig was committed. To better understand teacher commitment to inclusion, this study examined the perspectives and experiences of 8 elementary teachers who had included students with significant disabilities in their general education classrooms. A questionnaire was developed to determine prior and current opinions about inclusion and participants were assigned to one of the following categories: (a) those who were optimistic about inclusion prior to their experience of including a student with a significant disability and who have remained optimistic, (b) those who were optimistic about inclusion prior to their experience but who have become sceptical as a result of their experience, (c) those who were initially sceptical about inclusion prior to their experience of including a student with a significant disability but who have become optimistic as a result of their experience with inclusion, and (d) those who were initially sceptical about inclusion and who remain sceptical. Interviews were conducted to explore the effect their experiences had on their opinions about inclusion and the factors that facilitated or hindered teacher engagement. Qualitative analysis of the data suggested that teachers who are able to include students with significant disabilities are more engaged, are generally satisfied with their experiences and have become more optimistic about inclusion and more committed to it. Implications for teacher education and professional development are discussed.
2007-12-11 09:22:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jade645 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
British Journal Of Special Educational Needs. You will find them in the library. Teachers are in a difficult position to give a truly honest point of view.
2007-12-11 08:06:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Article about mastering online special education degree for teachers. See the source.
2007-12-11 23:51:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
go to a library (public or a school) and ask to use the Academic Databases (on the computer) and do a search for "inclusion", "speical education" or "Special Ed + Inclusion".
2007-12-13 07:45:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why don't you try going to a local school and just ask if any of them would be willing to talk to you? As a mom of two in the special ed system, I can tell you there are bad and good points to everything. I personally don't like it. Assistance isn't readily given like in a resource room, and kids must deal with the embarrassment of their peers knowing and making fun of them. The teacher/aid who is supposed to give the help also helps the entire class and not just the LS kids. So the quality of help isn't available either as he/she is spread too thin. Once an LS child is in that situation they tend not to ask for help to avoid the emotional issues and the aid doesn't typically just go to them and offer. This leads to failure and a decline in self esteem leaving the student with a bigger worry with peers who target LS kids. All of this turns into negative behaviors that get them into further trouble. It is a snowball affect.
2007-12-11 06:41:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well pros and cons on that could be opinions technically
2016-04-08 08:06:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋