English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

a race. an animal. basic design:survive, any means necessary. secondary coding(design):limited means. Such are humans, who will lie, or kill for basically anything that has meaning to them. Which again takes us back to the basic design. from the very first human to the latest generation, we carryu the same traits, same qualities, slightly differing from another, due to the secondary design, whcih we can call family, or religion, society, or simply emotions. We are all driven by emotions. Soul is an emotion. Guilt is an emotion. want is a an emotion and we all want many and different things. endless is their need for want. and contagious is this need, if its one thing they want. Money, pleasure, luxury, food, shelter! there is no such thing as a need AND a want, theres only the need for want.

2007-12-10 22:15:23 · 2 answers · asked by haz23412 2 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

They grow, wanting freedom, they grow some more, wanting money, luxury, all the things they do not posess, they grow a little bit more, and they want security, guarantee of their life over another. How confused can a race get? such simplicity, simple matter of greed, driven by it every day, every second, supereriosing themselves, over animals, over inanimate things, even over themselves!!!simple is the life of animals, born to survive, hunt, the best ones, the weak die!simple. simple is life.the only complex thing is finding meaning in it. finding meaning in something so binary, something so single, is defined as complexity. true?

2007-12-10 22:15:47 · update #1

type : the best ones live

2007-12-10 22:17:44 · update #2

typo* -

2007-12-10 22:18:12 · update #3

2 answers

Fear is the source of most of what you mentioned. Why have you given fear so many names?

Love and blessings Don

2007-12-11 00:06:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Next time, if you format your writing in a legible way (non-rant style), I'd read it better with less reserve and more energy. Thanks.

To give some honest feedback, it sounds too emotion-laden to be good philosophical writing/piece. It needs more coherence for one thing and it sounds like a preacher/exhorter, not a philosopher.

2007-12-11 07:22:29 · answer #2 · answered by Pansy 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers