http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071211/ap_on_re_us/us_iraq_ap_poll
2007-12-10 21:34:13 · 9 answers · asked by 2012 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
. You stablized Iraq only after Liberals nagged you to death and you got off your butss and did something about it. Soooo what will be the recourse? Trilateral negotiations of the secular parties will not work either. So your just gonna stay there?
2007-12-10 21:44:04 · update #1
If you murder two million people in an illegal war, do you think that your military can or has stabilize this situation? Age long hatreds are being created, so it's better to be honest and true to people of every race in the world.
If we say that the killing of two million people and the taking of two million lives is alright. Why don't Christians ask, how would a Christian god, the true god of Shem, Abraham, Issac, and Jacob, view illegal and intentionally planned killings and the taking of innocent lives?
For Christians only: Is god real? Does God truly exist? Can we disobey God? And is killing two million innocent people a large or small crime?
==========================================
FIRST EDIT:
Question: "Ok, Iraq is stablized now so what next cons?"
Answer: "You keep repeating the same pattern as this is the way life is dealt with!" Ie: Bush over and over again, lies by Hillary, lies by Obama, lies by Giuliani, and lies by whomever else comes along! Ron Paul, John Edward, Huckabee, Hunter, Romney, Thompson, and Tancredo.
You need to indict Bush to make known the law, which will stop future wrongdoing by American Presidents.
.
2007-12-10 22:11:33 · answer #1 · answered by peacenegotiator 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
"Even so, majorities remain upset about the conflict and convinced the invasion was a mistake, and the issue still splits the country deeply along party lines."
?
Can you say bias? Where does this information come from? Polls? The only source of "upset" and "mistake", I hear, is from the media. They do not decide for me, I make my own decision as to what is right and wrong. Very few people I know, believe this was wrong and has been a total failure. Even fewer believe there were no WMD.
Anyway, the next step is to keep Iraq stable. Of course. Assist with formation and strengthening the government and giving it feet to stand on its own. Then, we see what happens.
2007-12-11 05:45:16 · answer #2 · answered by Robert S 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Stabilized???? You must be taking the spin from white house and pentagon as gospel. Remember Gen Petraus views on the war in Iraq being already lost, before his masters forcibly changed his views, for his examination by congress???
2007-12-11 05:45:22 · answer #3 · answered by stainless steven 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Will Bush bring the troops home? NO - because he built the largest embasy in the world in Iraq. Bush intends to stay there forever. That was his plan from the beginning!!!
2007-12-11 05:44:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
There Is NOTHING STABLE ABOUT IRAQ!!! Just because Bush Gave OUR Enemy CASH and weapons in a deal to to stop killing Americans, So Now Our Enemy is in power and every one else has fled the country ,Bush said he would crush the enemy, instead,he paid them with YOUR $$ That Is Called TREASON!!!!!!
2007-12-11 06:01:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
WORKING conservatives help rebuild the economy and society and you get over the fact youve lost and, like other liberals, find something else to whine about.
2007-12-11 05:51:36 · answer #6 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I know where your coming from, but I'm not sure I believe 'stabilized' means what we are lead to believe it means.
2007-12-11 05:48:18 · answer #7 · answered by in pain 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
How can you stabilize a country that only knows fighting and always well be fighting each others.
2007-12-11 05:43:59 · answer #8 · answered by Kirk Neel 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Yes, Iraq is stabilized. You lost, walk it off, *****. There are plenty more webs to spin, best get to it.
2007-12-11 05:41:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋