that had nothing to do with OBL or 9/11?
2007-12-10 20:05:32 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What does Clinton, Edwards, and Kerry have to do with Bush invading Iraq????
2007-12-10 21:24:12 · update #1
The basis for Iraq was the premise that the Iraqi regime had weapons of mass destruction and that he was going to give them to terrorist to use abroad. Because the Iraqi government had a poor record of cooperation with UN inspectors to insure compliance with agreements after their failed invasion of Kuwait, they also have a history of using chemical warfare to subdue certain elements of it's society.
2007-12-10 20:16:29 · answer #1 · answered by xtowgrunt 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
What does Clinton, Edwards, and Kerry have to do with Bush invading Iraq????
Didn't they vote FOR the invasion of Iraq?
2007-12-11 15:50:19 · answer #2 · answered by badcarma98 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The real reason for invading Iraq is to lessen the dependence on saudi oil. Once the oilcompanies are set-up in Iraq it`s full throttle there for the american oilcompanies.
2007-12-10 22:19:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I completely agree with you! I understand why Bush wanted to invade Afghanistan and find Osama Bin Laden, but since Bush was not succeeding in that mission, he goes on this tyrade of how Iraq (a completely different country!) has a dictator who is developing weapons of mass destruction (which we never found!). I mean honestly, Osama Bin Laden does not = Saddam Hussein! And I might be mistaken, but if we are going to invade some random country because of rumors of some supposed weapons of mass destruction, shouldnt we should invade Korea? Bush seems to have forgotten about them.
2007-12-10 20:55:05 · answer #4 · answered by Jen 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
undecided. And the "9-11" fee did no longer even come close to to answering the numerous questions, (some reported for this reason), that make the Dumbya Coup squirm. this is why they did no longer want it interior the 1st place, then tried to sell Kissinger by way of fact the top. What it comes all the way down to is whether or no longer or no longer they're hiding gross incompetence or some thing much greater evil.
2016-11-02 21:06:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
conservatives have tried to explain it to you liberals hundreds of times in the repeat postings to no aviail. if you STILL cant understand it my suggestion is you might find your answer if you do what every other liberal does and wilkopedia the question. my suggestion is also wilkopedia al qaeda and terrorism so you get an idea of what working conservaitives are doing to defend your country. then you may understand that unilateral surrender is a pure fantasy and these actions were necessary for our defense. again the answer to your question is in wilkopedia as apparently you cant understand all the same answer to your repeat postings.
2007-12-10 21:55:48 · answer #6 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Welcome to the truth.
Remember Iraq had "Weapons of Mass destruction" that did not exist.
We are in Iraq because war is money.
"But why then is our economy so bad"?
Good question.
Because We are hiring private contractors for everything and they are making tons and tons of money.
If we really wanted to improve other countries wouldn't we pay there citizens to do reconstruction?
2007-12-10 20:17:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
why dont we all ask Clinton, Edwards and Kerry???
2007-12-10 21:09:12 · answer #8 · answered by Quickie D 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
3 words. Military Industrial Complex.....MONEY, MONEY, AND MORE MONEY. Person above summed it up.
I believe those 3 individuals voted to give the president authority to do what he did.....enablers if you will.
2007-12-10 20:25:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
yeah but he had BEEF with saddam didn't he?
2007-12-10 20:09:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋