do we need more state representives for the state?(1.higher population, 2....)?

Question

With rise of population, this spawns other beliefs’, principles’ and moral codes, is there a need for more state reprenstives in the senate, and congress. With increase of lobbyist and self interest groups, who force gray of products selling benefits without its moral, principles, belief prices.

America is based on independent thought, and acceptance of opinion in hopes of a belief of a greater good. But yet picking sides is a like choosing what is let of a double bladed sword based on own moral, principles’, and beliefs’. So where is the chair for the independent's in representive's for states, where is the middle, where is the gray, we live in the gray so where is it? 2 minds are better then one, but isn’t 3 minds better then 2. Majorities of prophets (Jesus, Moses, Elijah, Muhammad, Buda) wouldn’t they be the independent out the idea of love for all based on there ideals and ability to accept universal truths. For some there greed in the idea love conquers all for they are ideal

Why are there not more state senators based on increasing population meaning more answers and more questions? Why are there no independent(s) for each state in congress or the senate? Shouldn’t there be within all morality, love is acceptance.

Honesty is the best policy, but lairs prosper.

A idea is pure
A ideal is gray
A idealist is greedy.

to many cooks may spoil a stew. placed within each state rep(democrate or republican)
but a true indipendent is there to keep the stew in check and make it become all that more zestful and sweet.

Answer 1

Not really. Congress, on both sides, is having a hard enough time now with the number we already. More would only cause more problems.

What we need is term limits.

Answer 2

Increase in population of a territory will be a basis for reapportionment so that there will be a division of the district for additional representatives to the Legislature.