Seems to me like no matter who wins things will be better.
2007-12-10 16:06:12 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think someone needs to start taking some logic pills. Oy!
2007-12-10 16:44:18 · update #1
You're absolutely right. Bush has made a mockery of America and the American people. He and his administration are a disgrace.
2007-12-10 16:12:37 · answer #1 · answered by Pie's_Guy 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
examine maximum of those solutions and no person reall has a clue. This president has achieved many things that are useful for this united states and he has achieved some issues that are no longer so good, however the single undertaking he's surely have been given an rather undesirable stance on is immigration. All applicants, the two republican and democrat have their comments appropriate to the war and the thank you to to habit it, yet Bush's financial regulations have pulled us out of a recession we've been entering in Clinton's final years and his instantaneous movements after 9-11 have bolstered our place in the time of the the remainder of the international. yet giving the liberal democrats a sparkling voter base is punctiliously incorrect and the republican applicants are conscious of it.
2016-12-10 19:19:13 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think with any Democrats things will be better, it just a matter of degree
With the Republicans depending on who it is you'll see the same or worse
2007-12-10 16:59:42 · answer #3 · answered by EnberWolfe 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It has taken George some time to clean up the mess that Clinton left.
Hillary and Obama would both make worse, easily. You think medicine is socialized now! Wait till they get hold of it. I personally am not ready to go communist (Hillary). Either one of H or O would do all they could to destroy incentive to excel in the country on both ends of the curve.
2007-12-10 16:37:20 · answer #4 · answered by Stephen 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There is approximately an 80% chance that anyone else would at least accomplish SOMETHING. That chance is lower if another Con is elected. CONSERVatives don't seem to mind paying an official to do nothing but spin his wheels. I think that if it were up to them we would have never separated from the King of Great Britain.
2007-12-10 16:15:39 · answer #5 · answered by Socion 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The next puppet (guilianni) would be just as bad if not worse than Bush.
Bush is just a man working for the best interest of big businessess. Any person running the country like this would be just as bad.
2007-12-10 16:10:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
To Steve: Run out of anti-psychotic drugs?
2007-12-10 18:51:24 · answer #7 · answered by kingaeacus 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that you really need to pay close attention to the presidential race to get that answer. Bush has done a great job though. Before we criticize him, try to put yourself in his shoes. could you have done any better? The responsibility of being Perez is one that not many people can handle. It is always easier to criticize the ones that are in office, rather than suggest solutions.
2007-12-10 16:11:19 · answer #8 · answered by michael t 2 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Jimmy Carter is the proof that things could get worse.
No foreign experience, no economic insight -- an outsider who campaigned on cleaning up the mess and ended up installing the Ayatollahs in power in Iran.
***
sounds eeriely like Obama, doesn't he?
2007-12-10 16:10:19 · answer #9 · answered by Spock (rhp) 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Two sure things - Ron Paul and Hillary Clinton; either would be worse.
2007-12-10 16:10:09 · answer #10 · answered by smartr-n-u 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋