If could pick anyone to be President , would you pick me ?

Question

My goals are as follows -

1 - Military on Mexican border until we get up a triple fence .

2 - Jail all street gangs via RICO act .

3 - Pass a law banning business from expanding overseas .

4 - Abolish the Space program since there is no reason to waste billions of dollars looking at rocks when our infrastructure is in disarray here on earth !

5 - Expand the Presidents term to 5 years each , instead of 4 { I got to enjoy myself you know }

6 - End paper money , replace it with gold since it does not deflate .

7 - Set up neighborhood watches in every community .

8 - Put statues of the Constitution in every city in the country to remind people .

9 - Establish a train system to go to any city in America , sort of like Euro rail .

10 - Drug tests for people accepting welfare , if your on drugs - you lose out !

11 - Drugs tests for people in Congress { illegal and prescription since I believe alot of them are on anti-depressions , which could affect how they act } . Alert the people if they are and fire them if necessary .

Will you vote for me ?

Answer 1

1. Agree; we need stronger border control.

2. I would rather see drugs legalized. That would get rid of the gangs. In its place I would favor implementing Draconian, medieval punishments for the consequencies of drug and alcohol abuse. If you want to smoke crack, that's ok, but if the cops respond to a domestic disturbance and you are high, then you will be facing a 10 year sentence.

3. Disagree. It would kill our economy. Businesses big enough to leave would leave. Oil companies, for instance, would get killed. Besides, our country is premised on freedom and that would be a huge abolition of freedom.

4. Agree.

5. Agree.

6. Disagree, but I would love to hear the debate.

7. If people want neighborhood watches, they are free to organize them themselves.

8. In this day and age, you would have to come-up with a "media friendly" constitution that people would actually look at. It could feature Bart and Homer Simpson, for example.

9. Mmm...maybe. I would favor suspending government-imposed regulations and let private railroad companies compete.

10. Disagree. I would cut welfare completely. It's a state issue, not a Federal one.

11. YES!!! While we're at it, we should make them subject to the same laws that the rest of us chumps have to live with. The should pay pages the minimum wage. Their pension program should be tied to 30-year bonds so that they will have to live with the consequences of the legislation they pass today.

Answer 2

No. I don't agree with all your goals. Most are simplistic solutions to complicated issues like the military on the border(who's gonna pay for that and why ignore the underlying real issues that are a far better way to deal with illegal immigration), pass a law banning businesses going overseas (are you a communist? There are many laws and regulations standing in the way of such a law. It would mean an end to the free market. The President has a lot of power but he's not a dictator who can end free trade agreements at will)

Some goals are a result of being uninformed like replacing money with gold. The far right advocates the gold standard because it gets government out of the business of controlling the money supply. They fear that printing money creates inflation, and retracting money causes recessions. But the opposite is also true: printing money cures recessions, and retracting it cures inflation. Governments in the last 60 years have used these policies with tremendous success. There has not been a single depression or bank panic in any nation anywhere in the world using Keynesian monetary policies. But during the Gilded Age of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, depressions and bank panics were common. The historical record is so strong that mainstream economists reject the gold standard almost universally
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-gold.htm

Some of your goals are empty symbolism like hanging the Constitution everywhere. I'm not against it but I basically don't care one way or another. That doesn't change anything substantial.

Ending the space program to safe some cash sounds good to a lot of folks but you ignore its achivements and simplyfy them into something insegnificant. That's called demagogy, thank that space program when you use the Internet or GPS or watch any SATTELITE dish. You think those sattelites went up without a space program?

Another point why I would never consider voting for you is that you say nothing about issues that are very important to me. You fail to say anything about global poverty nor Americas poor, the enviorement and the war on terror

But even if I did with your goals, who are you? What's your expirience in government or leadership? Are you an honest person? All these questions are unanswered so for now I will stick with no

Answer 3

1. no 2.yes 3,yes 4.no 5.dont care 6. no 7. yes 8. yes 9. yes
10. no 11, illegal only

need positions on taxes for rich enviormenment and war before making choice some ideas are interesting universial health covrrages

Answer 4

Hell yes I would vote for you. I love the idea to Set up neighborhood watches in every community

Answer 5

But put you in the ring against today's R's and D's and you are the most freedom-loving candidate by far.

Important question: What's you stance on the war?

Also, #3: "Pass a law banning business from expanding overseas ." -- Bad one, we must remain competitive to compete globally.

Answer 6

Hmmm..... I like what I see so far although I disagree with your stance on the space program. Before I would consider voting for you I'd have to hear your plans for Social Security and Health Care.

Answer 7

If you were running against Hillary Clinton I would. Otherwise I'm not sure, some of your plan I like and some I don't like at all. For one, I hate carrying coins around.

Answer 8

I like the ski cap....

Yes, I would vote for you.

Answer 9

Yes, you would be electable.

Answer 10

You've got my vote. :)