Why "The Do Nothing " Democrats haven't try to impeach Bush yet? No WMD in Iraq! & the war was based on a lie

Answer 1

Dennis Kucinich has put forth articles of impeachment on Dick Cheney TWICE only to have it shelved into a committee. This hero of the American people is currently working on articles to present against Bush. (So far it is FIFTY PAGES of crimes and misdemeanors!)

Impeachment is NOT and should NOT be considered a partisan act. The founders of the Constitution put impeachment in to protect people from the Prez becoming a monarch or dictator. There is PLENTY of evidence/HARD proof of Bush and Cheney's "high crimes and misdemeanors. Anyone defending these two criminals are basing there feelings on blind party loyalty or sheer IGNORANCE.

The Democrat cowards and TRUE Conservative Republicans won't back Dennis on this due to saving their damn "jobs" (SUPPOSED TO BE "SERVICE".) instead of caring about America!

http://dennis4president.com

Answer 2

Yes we did find WMD in Iraq along with the material to produce more a few months. And the "Lie" about Iraq was told long before Bush was in office. Told by most of the Democrats in Congress. The only mistake Bush made was believing the Liberals would act as Americans and support the war on terror.

Answer 3

question for you: what is cerin gas and how lethal is it? it is a chemical agent that basically chokes you to death and 1 drop the size of a pin head in an enclosed room can kill about 20 adults within seconds. What would the 17 mortar rounds found in Irag each containing about 1-1/2 liters of cerin be capable of doing? Maybe killing every living creature in New York City? No WMD's?

Answer 4

A form of this question gets asked here almost hourly and has been for the last several weeks. Just like you all, your "do nothing" congress is looking for proof of an impeachable offense.

Just like you all, they can't find any either!!!

Go FRED!!!

Answer 5

lol and put Dick at the helm,the real mastermind behind all this?No Way...plus they would never get the votes to impeach him.more importantly it would divide our country,Democrats know that there are many other serious issues that face our nation and it wouldn't end the war anyway,it would be a political move and that would not help them or our country

Answer 6

Perhaps your crystal ball can tell us which of these was a lie!


"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 | Source Link Inactive

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 | Source http://www.cnn.com/US/9802/04/us.un.iraq/

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 | Source
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/02/18/iraq.political.analysis/

"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 | Source
http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9802/01/iraq/

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 | Source
http://www.usatoday.com/news/index/iraq/iraq172.htm

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton.- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 | Source
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/07/17/wh.critics/

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 | Source Link Inactive


My supposition as to the reason the democrats have not moved on impeachment is the fear that if by election time things in Iraq are much improved, they don't won't to look like total idiots. As of now, they only look like partial (as in partisan) idiots.

Answer 7

Well they would have to have proof of an actual impeachable offense first. And they have accomplished nothing all year because they spent all their time looking for that proof that just doesn't exist. Sorry but its time to face the facts.

Answer 8

Probably because the same "do nothing" Democrats that you speak of gave the president the authorization to go into Iraq.

Answer 9

?

What is all this... stuff...

Mass graves filled with Iraqi citizens killed by chemical weapons. This does not qualify as a WMD? Since when? Keep spreading the liberal lies, eventually the uneducated will believe.

Answer 10

Because impeachment was taken off the table by the Dem leadership during the 06 midterm elections. It would not be good for The USA during wartime.